Race and Ethnic Group Differences in Socioeconomic Status: Black Caribbeans, African Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites in the United States

By Manuel, Ron Carmichael; Taylor, Robert J. et al. | The Western Journal of Black Studies, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

Race and Ethnic Group Differences in Socioeconomic Status: Black Caribbeans, African Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites in the United States


Manuel, Ron Carmichael, Taylor, Robert J., Jackson, James S., The Western Journal of Black Studies


Black persons in the United States numbered approximately 39 million persons in the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS), including 3.5 million persons who were not born in the United States. Approximately 1.7 million of these 3.5 million persons were born in the Caribbean or West Indies, the primary source for Black persons not born in the U.S. Tabulations of 1980 and 2000 Census data, along with the 2010 ACS data, show that the number of West Indian-born Black persons increased from about 559,000 in 1980 to 1,687,000 in 2000, to 1,729,000 in 2010 (Ruggles & associates, 2010). Less restrictive quotas, resulting from legislation since the 1965 Hart-Cellar Immigration Act, have resulted in a much faster-paced growth in the number of West Indian migrants. Constituting roughly 2% of the U. S. Black population in 1980, West Indians represented 4.5% of that population in 2010. These migrants, and their off spring in the U.S., bring varying cultures and histories, and differing resources, circumstances, and needs--all helping to produce an increasingly ethnically diverse Black population in the United States. In this paper we examine ethnic-related socio-economic heterogeneity within the Black population of the United States. We focus particularly on African Americans and Black Caribbean West Indians. Extending documentation for the idea of ethnic-related differences within the African American population advances understanding of the little recognized heterogeneity of this population, and is of practical significance for policy and programmatic formulations that recognize race-linked disparities but fail to recognize perhaps equally prevalent within-race disparities.

Background

Sparse literature exists that is directly relevant for deriving hypotheses about expected ethnic group differences in economic well-being within the U.S. Black population. The assimilation model, from sociology's status attainment literature, represents one reasonably relevant thesis for interpreting data about expected Black ethnic-related economic heterogeneity. The assimilation model posits that over time immigrant groups become socially, culturally, and economically similar (Park & Burgess, 1921). The groups evolve to acculturate (or adopt host cultural patterns) and, eventually, structurally assimilate, the prevailing socio-cultural and economic norms in the larger society (Gordon, 1964). Assimilation, then, is a period of time [ten to fifteen years (Borjas, 1985; Model, 1995; Dodoo, 1997)] for settling in, establishing job-related networks, or simply obtaining the specialized training to take advantage of social and economic opportunities in the U.S. that facilitate joining mainstream society.

Research on this more recently labeled straight-line assimilation model (see Portes & Rumbaut, 2005) has not fully confirmed the idea. While some early research supported the reasoning (see Blau & Duncan, 1967), other work challenged the idea. Glazer & Moynihan (1963), for example, found support for the thesis only on some indicators and only for some groups (e.g., European-origin groups). They found little evidence for the assimilation of African Americans. Subsequent research, specifically that on Black persons in the U.S., concludes that Black Americans, migrant or not, have not joined the melting-pot of similarly situated ethnic groups implied by the assimilation thesis. This is particularly true regarding earnings and wealth (Hirschman, 1983; Bashi & Mcdaniel, 1997; Alba & Nee, 2003). Farley and Allen (1987) observed Black migrant earnings at 80 percent of White average earnings. Both African Americans and Black Caribbeans are less able than the average earner to convert human capital or social resources, like education or occupation, into income and other indicators of socio-economic status attainment (Neidert & Farley, 1985; Dodoo, 1997, Alba & Nee, 2003).

Research, historically, has also shown earnings (and other indicators of economic well-being) among Black migrants that, while not competitive with national (White American) norms, nevertheless, surpass the earnings of native-born African Americans.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Race and Ethnic Group Differences in Socioeconomic Status: Black Caribbeans, African Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites in the United States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.