The Normativity of Copying in Copyright Law

By Balganesh, Shyamkrishna | Duke Law Journal, November 2012 | Go to article overview

The Normativity of Copying in Copyright Law


Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, Duke Law Journal


III. THE BENEFITS OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY

Having seen how substantial similarity embodies an underappreciated structural dimension of the copyright entitlement and allows utilitarian and rights-based considerations to enter into the infringement analysis, we now move to identifying the benefits that are likely to flow from it. The advantages that are likely to accrue to the copyright system from this process are both formal and substantive. This Part identifies and discusses three such benefits of this analytical process: (i) it is likely to result in courts and judges exhibiting a greater degree of candor and forthrightness about the values that they are seeking to instantiate in the functioning of copyright law; (ii) it enables the bifurcation of copyright law's guidance for upstream and downstream actors; and (iii) it will allow the fair-use doctrine to focus on considerations unique to the defendant's actions, the core of a "defense."

A. Fine Tuning Copyright's Upstream and Downstream Guidance

As an incentive mechanism for creativity, copyright law is concerned with guiding behavior. Its promise of limited market exclusivity is thought to guide behavior by encouraging the very production of new creative works among authors. (276) Yet, this promise represents only one side of the story. As a mechanism of liability, copyright law is also about signaling to potential defendants the range of behavior that will be tolerated before liability is imposed. (277) It thus operates as an incentive not just for independent creativity but also for sequential or derivative creativity, in which defendants use and copy protected work in producing their own works. The distinction between the two incentive effects may usefully be characterized as "upstream" and "downstream," respectively. (278)

Copyright's upstream-guidance function seems to pose few problems in practice. Its promise of some protection for minimal amounts of creativity in expression forms a fairly robust signal to potential creators. On the downstream side, though, copyright's guidance for potential defendants has long been known to be problematic. Despite its being copyright's principal safety valve, the cost-benefit analysis that fair use entails is often largely unpredictable. (279) This in turn contributes to a significant degree of risk aversion, stifling what may be otherwise socially productive forms of using the protected work. (280) A sequenced ordering of copyright's goals through the substantial-similarity inquiry is likely to go some distance in alleviating this concern and in further fine tuning copyright's upstream incentives.

The second part of the substantial-similarity inquiry--the similarity analysis--can be seen as generating a distinct set of relational directives aimed exclusively at potential defendants--or, downstream creators. Unlike simple directives that operate in the nature of abstract prohibitions on certain kinds of conduct, for example, do not speed, relational directives are aimed at specific individuals, in an effort to protect their legal interests, for example, do not injure X. (281) Tort law is said to consist of relational directives that impose relational legal duties on individuals to act or refrain from acting in a certain way. (282)

It is crucial to appreciate the idea of a relational directive and to distinguish it from its simplistic characterization as a liability rule in the Calabresi-Melamed framework. (283) The law's mere imposition of liability for certain actions does not imply that individuals do not view themselves as being under an obligation to obey the law. In other words, individuals are very often motivated to comply with the law because it is the law and it speaks to them as a set of directives. (284) In pioneering work, Professor Dale Nance showed how the simplified understanding of all tort law as liability rules failed to capture this distinction, which he classified as the distinction between "guidance rules" and "enforcement rules. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Normativity of Copying in Copyright Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.