The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for PTSD in New York City Transit Workers: A Preliminary Evaluation

By Lowinger, Robert Jay; Rombom, Howard | North American Journal of Psychology, December 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for PTSD in New York City Transit Workers: A Preliminary Evaluation


Lowinger, Robert Jay, Rombom, Howard, North American Journal of Psychology


Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is based on the theory that behavior is determined by the way in which people think about themselves and their roles in the world; the therapy is aimed at correcting cognitive distortions and the self-defeating behavior that result from them (Kaplan & Sadock, 2005). The major tenets of CBT and its empirical support are reviewed in a number of sources (e.g., Butler, Chapan, Forman, & Beck, 2006; Corey, 2005). CBT is the most popular psychological treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder, generally focusing on reduction of PTSD symptoms and improvement of quality of life in spite of often chronic symptoms (Rademaker, Vermetten, & Kleber, 2009). While there are several studies indicating the efficacy of CBT for the clinical treatment of PTSD (see Mendes, Mello, Ventura, Passarela, & Mari, 2008), this study is distinctive in that it explores the usefulness of CBT in a population of transit workers who experienced a traumatic incident on the job. Although a number of studies have looked at the medical and psychological impact of trauma on transit workers (e.g., Cothereau, et al., 2004), we were unable to identify any published studies on the use of CBT for treating PTSD in this population. This is a particularly important population to assess relative to treatment efficacy due to the large volume of traumatic incidents that transit workers are exposed to over the course of their entire employment, the relatively high incidence rate of PTSD in this population, as well as the high motivation of this population to overcome the symptoms of PTSD so that they are able to return to work (Cothereau, et al. 2004; Limosin et al., 2005; Yum et al., 2006).

Existing studies of CBT treatment efficacy are based on an experimental paradigm in which CBT is compared with alternative treatments or a control group receiving no treatment in order to demonstrate efficacy (e.g., Anderson & Grunert, 1997; Davis & Wright, 2007; Foa et. al, 2005). Such studies reduce the influence of confounding variables, allow for comparison with other treatment modalities by the use of suitable control groups, as well as utilize standardized measures of treatment outcome. However, studies of the efficacy of CBT individual therapy typically employ manualized treatments of relatively short duration (less than six months) (e.g., Anderson & Grunert, 1997; Davis & Wright, 2007; Foa et. al, 2005) in order to provide for standardization and reduce study costs; although studies assessing the efficacy of group modalities (e.g., Alvarez, et al., 2011; Rademaker, et al., 2009) might employ treatments of longer duration. Furthermore, these studies depend on the administration of a battery of standardized measures, which are commonly administered only at the beginning and end of treatment, disregarding any measurement of client progress during the course of the treatment.

While experimental studies have much to offer in terms of scientific validity, they may not be representative of a good deal of clinical practice in which treatment protocols, the duration of treatment, as well as the assessment of client progress are often based on a combination of clinical and informal client judgment. The present study explores the efficacy of CBT conducted in a large outpatient behavioral medicine psychological practice. In this setting, psychologists use CBT more eclectically than in a manualized approach (for example, sometimes using exposure techniques and sometimes not) depending upon clinical judgment as to what might or might not be helpful for a particular client in a particular session. Furthermore, treatment duration is highly variable based upon the client's decision to terminate in consultation with the treating psychologist. Also, measures of treatment efficacy are often limited to the clinical judgment of the treating therapist's assessment of client progress on a comprehensive list of relevant symptoms rather than on standardized measures with demonstrated psychometric characteristics.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for PTSD in New York City Transit Workers: A Preliminary Evaluation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?