Malthus's Political Views in 1798: A 'Foxite' Whig?

By Nakazawa, Nobuhiko | History of Economics Review, Summer 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Malthus's Political Views in 1798: A 'Foxite' Whig?


Nakazawa, Nobuhiko, History of Economics Review


Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to examine Thomas Robert Malthus's early political views. He was an earnest sympathiser with Charles James Fox and his opposition party who regarded themselves as the defenders of English traditional civil and religious liberties. However, he was not simply a Foxite Whig. While Fox despised political economy for its speculative nature, Malthus admired Adam Smith's new economic science for its practical use. As a 'scientific' Foxite Whig, he endeavoured to add the vocabulary of political economy to that of the Foxite circle. His first Essay on the Principle of Population testified the birth of a new Whiggism by going beyond the linguistic tradition of the Foxite politics of the late 1790s.

1 Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to explore the historical context of Malthus's first Essay on the Principle of Population (1798) with particular reference to his political philosophy and party allegiance. It is widely known that one of the origins of this polemical work, as its subtitle makes clear, lies in the debate on human perfectibility that arose during the French revolution. It might therefore be expected that the serious Whig split of 1794, which was also triggered by different reactions to French revolutionary principles and the French war, had some influence on the shaping of Malthus's first Essay on Population. Surprisingly, however, there have been remarkably few assessments of the historical relationship between Malthus and the Whigs, except for a few fragmentary comments by Bonar (1966 [1924]: 338), Halevy (1966 [1934]: 338), Grampp (1986 [1974]: 30-2) and Winch (1987: 49; 1996: 253). Hence, Donald Winch commented:

   In terms of party labels, Malthus must be firmly placed in the Whig
   camp though at a time when the Whigs were divided into a number of
   factions, and alliances were fluid, this is not a particularly
   enlightening ascription. Judging his position from the fragmentary
   quotations from his unpublished pamphlet on The Crisis written in
   1796, it would seem that he was then a Foxite Whig, opposed to the
   repressive measures taken by the Pitt Ministry to curb the
   pro-French, anti-war, and reformist activities of the radical
   corresponding societies. (1987: 49)

Malthus's party allegiances at this time can be established from the fragments of an anonymous pamphlet on The Crisis ... which he hoped to publish in 1796. What these tell us is that Malthus, probably in common with his father, was some kind of Foxite Whig, critical of the way in which the Duke of Portland, together with Edmund Burke, had gone over to Prime Minister Pitt as soon as war with France had begun (Winch 1996: 253; see also 1992: viii).

Winch's description of Malthus as a 'Foxite Whig' may sound inconsistent since Charles James Fox (1749-1806) was famous as a most earnest sympathiser of the French revolution, whilst Malthus's first Essay on Population is widely known as a counter-revolutionary work, similar in some ways to Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790). In short, Malthus a 'conservative' is not easily reconciled with his being a Whig supporter of the 'radical' Fox. How can this apparent paradox be resolved? Winch's statements seem too sketchy to help us. An answer to this question will be given only by reconstructing Malthus's early political philosophy.

Though Winch only hinted at Malthus as a Foxite Whig, I will endeavour in this paper to clarify this aspect of his political position. Section 2 will first focus on Malthus's political beliefs during the constitutional crisis of 1782-4. Section 3 will then consider his response to the steady disintegration of the opposition Whig party in the 1790s. In section 4 the paper considers Malthus's position in connection to the poor relief controversy of the late 1790s. A short conclusion is provided in section 5.

2 Malthus and the Constitutional Crisis of 1782-4

Thomas Robert Malthus was born on 13 February 1766, the second son and sixth child of a well-to-do country gentleman, Daniel Malthus (1730-1800).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Malthus's Political Views in 1798: A 'Foxite' Whig?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?