Copyright Protection in an Opt-Out World: Implied License Doctrine and News Aggregators

By Jasiewicz, Monika Isia | The Yale Law Journal, December 2012 | Go to article overview

Copyright Protection in an Opt-Out World: Implied License Doctrine and News Aggregators


Jasiewicz, Monika Isia, The Yale Law Journal


In the 1918 Supreme Court case that gave rise to the common law doctrine of "hot news" misappropriation, the Associated Press (AP) famously sued the International News Service (INS), a competing newswire, for copying factual content from AP news stories without crediting the AP. (1) Nearly a century has passed, and the AP is going after a news collection service again. In February 2012, the AP filed suit against Meltwater News, an online "news aggregator," for copyright infringement and "hot news" misappropriation. (2) On their face, the two cases present nearly identical issues, down to the same plaintiff. But times have changed--and so should the law.

The current suit is only the latest in a rash of recent copyright and hot news litigation (3) aimed at combatting news aggregators, or websites and mobile applications that digitally copy headlines and short excerpts of news stories from various Internet sources and display them all in one place. (4) In light of the many economic challenges facing traditional news media today, (5) commentators have been swift to blame news aggregators for free riding off newspapers' and magazines' expensively produced content. (6) Because intellectual property law does not grant copyright protection in news itself, (7) academics and government actors have sought new solutions to the news aggregator problem. In 2009, for instance, Judge Richard Posner suggested amending the Copyright Act so that news aggregators could be held liable for infringement. (8) Media law practitioners, meanwhile, have called for the federalization of hot news misappropriation through legislation. (9) The Federal Trade Commission even held a policy roundtable in 2010 that considered several different solutions to the aggregator problem, including compulsory licensing and statutory limits to fair use. (10)

All of these conversations are fundamentally misguided because they attempt to address the problem of online news aggregation as if it were a traditional hot news or copyright issue. The similarity of the current aggregator problem to the paradigmatic hot news case is actually a red herring. As it turns out, the Meltwater case has less in common with INS v. AP--or, for that matter, with traditional copyright infringement cases--and more to do with recent case law governing the operation of online search engines.

This Comment argues that the appropriate legal framework for addressing news aggregators lies in federal courts' handling of intellectual property claims against search engines. In the 2006 case of Field v. Google, Inc., (11) a federal district court applied a new version of the doctrine of implied license to hold that Google's indexing of websites does not amount to copyright infringement when a website owner has not affirmatively opted out of indexing through technological measures. (12) This Comment argues that extending the Field decision to news aggregators would establish a legal framework that is more appropriate to the technological reality of the modern news industry and could also prove mutually beneficial. Thus far, implied license doctrine online has been characterized primarily as benefitting would-be infringers. (13) Indeed, aggregators themselves have relied on implied licenses as defenses against infringement in recent litigation. (14) But this Comment is the first to recognize that implied license doctrine can actually benefit content originators too, by giving legal force to a nearly costless technological solution: so-called robots exclusion protocols, or lines of code written into websites that would tell aggregators to stay away.

In Part I below, I expand on the news aggregator problem and briefly consider commonly proposed solutions. Part II describes the emerging standard of opt-out schemes for gaining copyright holders' permissions online and examines how the Field decision enforces this standard as a matter of law. Finally, in Part III, I explain how extending implied license doctrine to news aggregators can benefit both aggregators and newspapers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Copyright Protection in an Opt-Out World: Implied License Doctrine and News Aggregators
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.