The End Game of Deregulation: Myopic Risk Management and the Next Catastrophe

By McGarity, Thomas O.; Steinzor, Rena I. | Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The End Game of Deregulation: Myopic Risk Management and the Next Catastrophe

McGarity, Thomas O., Steinzor, Rena I., Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum


On December 22, 2008, the contents of an enormous impoundment containing coal-ash slurry from the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Kingston Fossil Fuel Plant poured into the Emory River. The proximate cause of the spill was the bursting of a poorly reinforced dike holding back a pit of sludge that towered 80 feet above the river and 40 feet above an adjacent road) The volume and force of the spill were so large that 1.1 billion gallons of the inky mess flowed across the river, inundating 300 acres of land in a layer four to five feet deep, uprooting trees, destroying three homes, and damaging dozens of others. (2) The catastrophic breach ruptured a gas line, caused millions of dollars in property damage, and caused incalculable environmental damage to the Emory River and its receiving water, the Clinch River. (3) A week after the spill, heaps of gray material remained in the river like small volcanic islands. (4) Miraculously, no one was killed. (5)

The slurry contained both fly and bottom ash, collectively known as "coal combustion residuals" (CCRs) in the euphemistic lexicon of environmental regulation. (6) Because coal-fired power plants have scrubbers that trap fumes before they are emitted into ambient air, the fly-ash portion of the spill contained significantly more than the quota of toxic heavy metals that typically result from burning coal. (7) Or, in other words, in an inevitable but ironic twist, the benefits to breathers were obtained at the expense of walkers and drinkers. TVA later estimated that the Kingston Spill had released around 2.6 million pounds of toxic pollutants into the Emory River. (8) By way of comparison, all of the other power plants in the United States released just over 2 million pounds of toxic pollutants during all of 2007. (9) Cleanup costs for the federally subsidized TVA, one of the largest electric utilities in the country, are expected to total $1.2 billion, adding $0.69 per month to the utility bills of nine million customers until 2024. (10)

The Kingston spill was the worst of its kind in U.S. history, but it was not the first, nor would it be the last. For a brief period of time, the catastrophe focused the nation's attention on the health and environmental risks posed by dumping coal ash in unlined pits in the ground referred to as "surface impoundments." (11) Prominent national environmental groups demanded greater protection from Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), both of which had long skittered away from confronting the problem in the face of unyielding resistance by electric utilities to any hint of regulatory intervention that would compel the safer disposal of coal ash and the reinforcement of old, poorly designed, and carelessly maintained coal-ash dumps. (12)

In the immediate aftermath of the catastrophe, Congressman Nick Rahall (D-WV) introduced a bill that would have authorized the Department of Interior to promulgate uniform federal design, engineering, and performance standards for new coal-ash impoundments. (13) Three congressional committees devoted six hearings to the need for proper regulation of coal-ash wastes. (14) Notably, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson promised to reevaluate by the end of 2009 the agency's decades-old reluctance to regulate the disposal of some 129 million tons of coal ash generated annually, (15) a startling figure when compared to the 250 million tons of every category of household garbage that Americans generated in 2010. (16)

Jackson met this deadline. (17) But her efforts were thwarted when an intensive industry lobbying campaign provoked the White House to rewrite the EPA proposal, adding two significantly weaker options and derailing the momentum of Jackson's proposal. (18) The 111th Congress failed to enact protective legislation and, in the aftermath of the 2010 mid-term election that transferred control of the House of Representatives back to the Republican Party, the 112th Congress nearly enacted legislation that would have divested the EPA of its authority to adopt strong coal-ash rules.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The End Game of Deregulation: Myopic Risk Management and the Next Catastrophe


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?