Leveraging the Courts to Protect Women's Fundamental Rights at the Intersection of Family-Wage Work Structures and Women's Role as Wage Earner and Primary Caregiver

By Maxwell, Jill | Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

Leveraging the Courts to Protect Women's Fundamental Rights at the Intersection of Family-Wage Work Structures and Women's Role as Wage Earner and Primary Caregiver


Maxwell, Jill, Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy


INTRODUCTION

The gap between men's and women's labor force participation steadily narrowed for over two decades until progress slowed in the mid-1990s. (1) Before the mid-1990s, "[w]omen, especially married mothers with young children, continued to enter the labor force in ever-growing numbers. They integrated previously male occupations, especially middle-class occupations, and narrowed the earnings gap with men more in the 1980s than in any other decade...." (2) Women's labor force participation peaked at sixty percent in 1999 and has plateaued, and even declined, since then. (3) The plateau in progress that has characterized the pattern of gender workplace equality since the mid-1990s cannot be explained as "structural or broadly ideological." (4) It is most likely the result of a "specifically antifeminist backlash in the popular culture." (5) This antifeminist backlash co-opted the feminist rhetoric of choice and equality by describing career mothers who leave the workplace as "opting" for full-time motherhood, even if the "choice" was prompted "by unsupportive work environments or increased job demands." (6) By using a feminist rhetoric of "choice" to describe the pattern of women's departure from the workplace in favor of full-time caregiving, the rhetoric remains insulated from broad criticism, perpetuates an inaccurate image of women's complicated life reality as wageworker and caregiver, and maintains a status quo workplace structure that is inherently discriminatory against women.

As this article highlights through statistics and anecdotes, a woman's "choice" to leave the workplace--if the option exists at all--is not as simple as popular culture would let us believe. Rather, most women, including married women, need to work to support their families. (7) But women are also society's primary caregivers of children and the elderly, whether out of necessity, (8) conformance to traditional gender roles, (9) or choice. (10) Because the American workplace structure remains rooted in the family-wage ideal, (11) in which a male breadwinner and a female homemaker comprise each household, women must fit their family caregiving responsibilities into a workplace structure defined around the ideal worker, who does not have such responsibilities. (12) The result is the marginalization and exclusion of women from work and stagnant progress towards workplace equality. (13) Although women comprise close to half of the workforce, they lag behind men in wages and leadership positions, (14) and continue to be discriminated against because of their caregiver status. (15) And, although popular culture focuses on women in higher-income jobs and households, women in low- and middle-income jobs--those with the least flexible jobs and the most need for the income--carry the heaviest burden. (16)

This article argues that the stagnant progress in workplace equality results in part from the persistence of family-wage barriers. Family-wage barriers arise at the intersection of a workplace designed around a worker without family caregiving responsibilities and women's role as primary caregivers. (17) These barriers manifest as work structures that favor a worker without caregiving responsibilities, (18) and as policies and practices that penalize caregivers directly or indirectly, including strict adherences to work structures designed around the ideal worker. (19) Courts recognize mistaken gender stereotype-based assumptions about a caregiver's job performance as sex discrimination. (20) But they have had few opportunities and been reluctant to recognize that family-wage barriers implicate and infringe on women's fundamental constitutional rights, regardless of the evidence of stereotyped assumptions. (21) Focusing on mothers, (22) this article highlights the equal protection and substantive due process rights at stake for working women subjected to unfavorable treatment because of their status as caregivers, as distinguished from unfavorable treatment because of gender-stereotyped assumptions based on that status. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Leveraging the Courts to Protect Women's Fundamental Rights at the Intersection of Family-Wage Work Structures and Women's Role as Wage Earner and Primary Caregiver
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.