Inside Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood: Two Years after the Dawn of the Arab Spring and Six Months after Mohamed Morsi Was Elected President, Democracy Is Still a Work in Progress in Egypt. Moment's Daphna Berman Talks with Eric Trager of the Washington Institute for near East Policy

Moment, January-February 2013 | Go to article overview

Inside Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood: Two Years after the Dawn of the Arab Spring and Six Months after Mohamed Morsi Was Elected President, Democracy Is Still a Work in Progress in Egypt. Moment's Daphna Berman Talks with Eric Trager of the Washington Institute for near East Policy


WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD?

It was founded in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, a schoolteacher. The goal was to create a vanguard that could Islamize all its members, then society and the state and from there, pursue a regional Islamic order. The Brotherhood has two streams of thought: One is called Duat hi Qudat, which means preachers, not judges. These are people who want to focus on social services, outreach and preaching, not politics. The second stream is called the Qutbists, named for Sayyid Qutb, who believed the Brotherhood should be a political vanguard for achieving power and confronting secularization and westernization. Mohamed Morsi is very much a Qutbist. Actually, the Brotherhood leadership is Qutbist, and those who subscribe to the other school have basically been ousted.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

HOW DID THE GROUP FARE UNDER PRESIDENTS GAMEL ABDEL NASSER, AN WAR SADAT AND HOSNI MUBARAK?

The Muslim Brotherhood grew very rapidly in the 1930s and 1940s and cooperated with Nasser during the 1952 Officers' Revolution that ousted the monarchy. But shortly thereafter, Nasser came to recognize the Brotherhood's political strength as a threat to his authority, so he executed a mass crackdown. This crackdown picked up after the Muslim Brotherhood allegedly tried to assassinate Nasser, so from the 1950s to early 1970s, its leadership was imprisoned, exiled or underground. Anwar Sadat briefly loosened the reins on the Islamists to boost his own domestic credibility, but they began to pose a threat to him, especially after he reoriented Egyptian policy toward the West and signed a peace treaty with Israel. Sadat, too, cracked down. And after Islamists in the military who were not connected to the Brotherhood assassinated Sadat in 1981, Hosni Mubarak once again loosened the reins until he too came to see the Brotherhood as a threat. In 1995 he cracked down and many Brothers were arrested and imprisoned. So this organization has operated under repressive conditions for many years, and there is no question that this affects its view of the world. This is why no one should have expected the Brotherhood to rule democratically: Its experience in politics has been in a very repressive, autocratic setting.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

WAS THE RISE OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD PREDICTABLE AFTER THE FALL OF MUBARAK?

After the revolution, the A luslim Brotherhood was the only organized opposition group in Egypt. Despite the intense repression, it still had the sanctuary of mosques because the regime did not have the legitimacy to completely penetrate the mosques. So Islamists had a safe place to organize, whereas non-Islamists--liberals, leftists, socialists, communists--didn't. The Muslim Brotherhood also has a system of recruitment and internal promotion that enabled it to survive even the worst abuses under Mubarak. The very process of becoming a Muslim Brother takes five to eight years, and during that time Muslim Brothers are promoted through five levels of membership. At each stage, they are vetted for their completion of a segment of the Brotherhood's curriculum, their commitment to the cause and their ability to take orders from the leadership. This process ensured that no one would become a Muslim Brother who would give information to the regime. It's a uniquely strong organization in that all of its members have been vetted over the years for their commitment to the cause. In that sense, it's much more like a cult than a political party, but with hundreds of thousands of not just members, but foot soldiers.

DID THE OPPOSITION HAVE A CHANCE AT THE POLLS?

The opposition lost the elections because it's deeply divided among leftists, socialists, Nasserists, communists, Christians and old regime figures. In each of those categories, you typically have multiple parties, whereas the Brotherhood can consistently move a critical mass of people in every district.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Inside Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood: Two Years after the Dawn of the Arab Spring and Six Months after Mohamed Morsi Was Elected President, Democracy Is Still a Work in Progress in Egypt. Moment's Daphna Berman Talks with Eric Trager of the Washington Institute for near East Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.