The Impact of CACREP Accreditation: A Multiway Frequency Analysis of Ethics Violations and Sanctions

By Even, Trigg A.; Robinson, Chester R. | Journal of Counseling and Development : JCD, January 2013 | Go to article overview

The Impact of CACREP Accreditation: A Multiway Frequency Analysis of Ethics Violations and Sanctions


Even, Trigg A., Robinson, Chester R., Journal of Counseling and Development : JCD


One of the most critical issues facing counselor education today is whether graduates of counselor education programs are competent to practice independently (Adams, 2006; Kerl, Garcia, McCullough, & Maxwell, 2002; Levitt, 2004). Because of gatekeeping policies and procedures, some students who demonstrate personal and professional liabilities do not continue toward graduation and licensure (Bradey & Post, 1991; Lumadue & Duffy, 1999; Morrissette & Gadbois, 2006; Tjeltveit, 1999). However, the majority of students who enter counselor education programs do graduate and continue toward licensure. So, then, the assumption of any profession and the public that embraces its service is that certified and licensed members of that profession have demonstrated a minimum degree of competence. By the nature of their membership in the profession, they agree to adhere to the standards of that profession, to participate in maintaining--if not increasing--public trust in and voluntary receipt of professional services, and to advocate for and protect that profession's collective identity.

Regrettably, ethical misconduct--defined here as acts of commission or omission that directly violate the standards of the profession as reflected in various codes of ethics and state licensure laws and regulations--draws both question and concern about how counselors are trained and socialized into the profession. Although the prevalence of confirmed ethics and licensure violations is limited to just 0.5% to 1% of total membership (Neukrug, Milliken, & Walden, 2001), Gentry (2007) estimated that 10% of counselors are actively violating an ethics code at any given time. Ethical misconduct harms clients, counselors, and public trust (Welfel, 1998) while raising criticism about counselor professionalism, competence, and congruence with the larger professional identity displayed by most counselors. Because ensuring competence among counselor education graduates is of critical importance and because ethical conduct is positioned as hallmark evidence for competence, those factors that potentially affect the behaviors that counselors display should be assessed.

Contributors to this literature believe that ethics training matters. Mascari and Webber (2006) noted that a slippery slope toward engaging in ethical misconduct resulted from the interaction of problems of professional identity and the effects of inadequate training. Freeman (2000) stated that students who graduate from counselor education programs may be ill-prepared to manage ethical dilemmas. Although training in ethics may have steadily increased in counselor education (Colby & Long, 1994; Neukrug et al., 2001; Urofsky & Engels, 2003), it appears that the content and delivery of ethics education varies widely (Downs, 2003; Urofsky & Sowa, 2004). Hill (2004) reported that "research to date has provided little clear evidence of the impact of instruction in ethics on the ethics of professional counselors" (p. 185).

In counselor education, ethics instruction is delivered via two primary methods. Hill (2004) reported that approximately one fourth of counselor education programs preferred a standalone ethics course. It appears that most counselor education programs prefer an infused or integrated approach to teaching ethics. Because ethics was believed to be an essential component of the counselor education curriculum, the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP; 2009) required accredited programs to address ethics regardless of specialty area but did not specify the manner of delivery.

Since its inception in 1981, CACREP has functioned as the primary accrediting organization for the counseling profession. The CACREP (2009) Standards are standards by which counselor education programs are evaluated and subsequently granted or denied accreditation. Generally, CACREP's influence on counselor education curricula has been perceived as favorable (Hensley, Smith, & Thompson, 2003; Holcomb-McCoy, Bryan, & Rahill, 2002; McGlothlin & Davis, 2004; Milsom & Akos, 2005; Vacc, 1992).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Impact of CACREP Accreditation: A Multiway Frequency Analysis of Ethics Violations and Sanctions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.