Emergence of New States in Africa and Territorial Dispute Resolution: The Role of the International Court of Justice

By Majinge, Charles Riziki | Melbourne Journal of International Law, June 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Emergence of New States in Africa and Territorial Dispute Resolution: The Role of the International Court of Justice


Majinge, Charles Riziki, Melbourne Journal of International Law


This article examines the potential contribution of the International Court of Justice ('Court') in resolving current and emerging territorial disputes in Africa. The article contends that the Court as the principal judicial organ of the Charter of the United Nations ('UN Charter') has had a significant role in resolving territorial disputes on the continent. An in-depth discussion of various disputes the Court has addressed in the past demonstrates the unique role and capability of the Court to address potential disputes of a similar nature. The article further argues that the decision by some African countries to voluntarily submit their disputes to the Court and the willingness of those nations to implement the outcomes of such referrals demonstrates the growing belief among these countries in the pivotal role of the Court in furthering the principles and goals reflected in the UN Charter. On the basis of this positive contribution of the Court, this article contends that current and potential territorial disputes, such as those in Ethiopia and Sudan, should be referred to the Court for determination. The involvement of the Court in such disputes will not only contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security in Africa but will also enhance the international rule of law by encouraging countries to resolve their disputes peacefully.

CONTENTS

I   Introduction
II  The UN Charter and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes
III The Court and Dispute Settlement in Africa
IV  The Contribution of the Court in Territorial Disputes in Africa
      A Continental Shelf (Tunisia v Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)
      B Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Malta)
      C Arbitral Award of 31 July 1989 (Guinea-Bissau v Senegal)
      D Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso v Republic of Mall)
      E Territorial Dispute (Libya Arab Jamahiriya v Chad)
      F Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana v Namibia)
      G Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria
        (Cameroon v Nigeria)
V   Evaluation of the Court's Contribution in Territorial Dispute
    Settlement in Africa
VI  Potential Contribution of the Court in Territorial Disputes in
    Emerging States in Africa
VII Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

Since the League of Nations was founded, the quest to preserve 'peace among nations' has been the primary objective of the United Nations. (1) It is in pursuit of this goal that the Covenant of the League of Nations and the Charter of the United Nations ('UN Charter') made the peaceful settlement of disputes the defining feature of their mission. (2) However, the founding of these institutions did not completely prevent the use of force among nations as an important mechanism to attain foreign policy objectives. Indeed, it was the failure of the member states to honour the founding objectives of the League of Nations to resolve disputes peacefully that led to the devastation caused by the Second World War. (3)

In the aftermath of the Second World War, during the negotiations and eventual adoption of the UN Charter in San Francisco, the negotiators decided to incorporate the Statute of the International Court of Justice ('ICJ Statute') as an integral part of the UN Charter. (4) This decision was important in two aspects--namely reaffirming the pivotal role of peaceful settlement of disputes among nations and also providing a mechanism within which states could resolve their differences peacefully. (5) The incorporation of the ICJ Statute as an integral part of the UN Charter demonstrated the willingness of states to create a forum where disputes could be resolved peacefully bearing in mind the devastating consequences of the Second World War.

The primary goal of this inquiry is to examine the potential role of the International Court of Justice ('Court') in resolving territorial disputes in emerging states in Africa and consider the extent of the Court's contribution to the maintenance of international peace and security in Africa.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Emergence of New States in Africa and Territorial Dispute Resolution: The Role of the International Court of Justice
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?