Constitutional Law - Economic Legislation - D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to Milk Regulation

Harvard Law Review, February 2013 | Go to article overview

Constitutional Law - Economic Legislation - D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to Milk Regulation


Economic liberty, defined broadly as "the right to earn a living through trade or labor," (1) is protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. (2) Starting in the New Deal era, however, courts have afforded sweeping deference to legislatures when hearing challenges to laws impinging on claimants' economic freedoms, leaving governments free to "adopt whatever economic policy may reasonably be deemed to promote public welfare." (3) In 1938, the Supreme Court held that economic liberties are not fundamental rights worthy of close scrutiny by the courts. (4) Today, courts review legislation affecting this class of rights under the highly deferential rational basis test, under which a law is upheld "if there is any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis" relating the law to a legitimate government purpose. (5) As a consequence, citizens who have been wronged by their government in the economic sphere are left with no recourse but the inhospitable democratic processes that infringed on their liberties in the first place. (6)

Recently, in Hettinga v. United States, (7) the D.C. Circuit upheld the dismissal of a challenge to a statute regulating dairy markets. (8) An impassioned concurring opinion by a majority of the panel, however, challenged the blind deference to legislatures that precedent demands, signaling its discontent with the doctrinal status quo in the field of economic liberty. (9) Democratic processes are sometimes manipulated by special interest politics, and in an effort to be ideologically neutral toward any economic policy, courts may be enabling the "crony capitalism" that afflicts the American economy by foreclosing any meaningful opportunity for citizens to challenge laws curtailing their economic liberties. (10) Given the present concern over the influence of corporate interests on the American political process, the time is ripe for the Supreme Court to reconsider its approach to constitutional challenges to economic legislation as a new way to guard against illegitimate special interest policies.

Dairy farmers and milk processors operate under a complex regulatory scheme established by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (11) (AMAA). Under the AMAA, producers supply raw milk to handlers, who must then pay money into a centralized pool called the "producer settlement fund." (12) These payments are regularly redistributed to producers at a fixed rate based on the quantity of milk sold. (13) Until recently, the Secretary of Agriculture exempted from participation in the price-control system farmers who operated both as producers and handlers (14) and handlers who sold milk to customers in regions that were not regulated under the federal scheme. (15)

Hein and Ellen Hettinga owned two dairies in Arizona that operated under the exceptions present in the AMAA. (16) By operating outside the scope of the AMAA, the Hettingas were able to sell milk to retailers at discounted prices. (17) This advantage evaporated, however, when the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) enacted a Final Rule (18) that eliminated the exceptions underpinning the Hettingas' business advantage. (19) The Hettingas challenged the rule, (20) but their case was still pending when Congress passed the Milk Regulatory Equity Act of 2005 (21) (MREA), which amended the AMAA to include the Final Rule's major provisions. The only dairy operations in the country impacted by these laws were those owned by the Hettingas. (22)

The Hettingas dropped their USDA challenge and brought suit against the United States, alleging that the MREA was unconstitutional because (1) it was an unlawful bill of attainder, (2) it violated their equal protection rights by singling them out for enforcement, and (3) it denied them due process by mooting their challenge to the USDA rule. (23) The district court dismissed the Hettingas' case for failure to exhaust their administrative remedies pursuant to the AMAA. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Constitutional Law - Economic Legislation - D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to Milk Regulation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.