Last Chance to Repair Mr. Roberts' Obamacare Error; Liberty U. Challenges on Religious Liberty Grounds

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 11, 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Last Chance to Repair Mr. Roberts' Obamacare Error; Liberty U. Challenges on Religious Liberty Grounds


In 1919, back when the United States was a constitutional republic, Congress passed a child-labor law imposing a 10 percent excise tax on companies that violated it.

A North Carolina furniture maker challenged the law and won. In 1922, the Supreme Court ruled in Bailey v. Drexel Furniture that although child-labor laws have a noble purpose, the means - Congress using taxing power as a penalty - was unconstitutional.

This was before Franklin Roosevelt's court-packing threat in 1937 ended the Supreme Court's resistance to grandiose expansions of federal power. The child-labor issue, by the way, was resolved when states enacted laws prohibiting exploitation.

The Drexel decision resurfaced as precedent last year at the Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. That's where the Roberts court upheld the individual mandate to buy health insurance as an indirect tax, and thus upheld Obamacare as constitutional.

The court ruled that Congress can't make people buy a product, but that it can tax people who choose not to buy it. Yes, it's as wacky as the 1942 Wickard v. Filburn ruling, in which a farmer was fined under interstate commerce regulations for raising grain for his own cows. And you wonder how the federal government got so big?

In the Obamacare case, the majority justified the tax ploy by saying that the individual mandate didn't rise to the level of a punitive penalty as rejected in Drexel.

The Roberts court also ruled that the employer mandate to provide employee health insurance could not be justified under the Taxing and Spending Clause that the court used to justify the individual mandate because it involves a severe penalty like the one that Drexel struck down.

This brings us to a glimmer of hope that the court will right the massive wrong of finding Obamacare constitutional. They can do this by ruling for Liberty University, which has sued to overturn the employer mandate on religious freedom grounds. The independent Christian college has several reasons for challenging the employer mandate, but it boils down to the fact that the penalty is so severe that it would bankrupt the college.

In January 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services issued an order implementing Obamacare, formally titled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA, by requiring employers that have 50 or more employees to provide minimum essential coverage for employees and dependents. The minimum includes abortifacients, contraceptives and sterilization. After a public uproar, the department gave Catholic hospitals and faith-based colleges such as Liberty a year to figure out how to violate their consciences. Not even that was offered to businesses like the craft chain Hobby Lobby, whose Christian owners are also refusing to comply and are challenging the law.

In an amicus brief filed on March 6 at the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, American Civil Rights Union general counsel Peter Ferrara notes: If Liberty University complies with the employer mandate ... it will violate fundamental religious beliefs that life begins at conception, and that abortion is consequently murder of preborn children in their mothers' wombs. The PPACA consequently mandates that the university violate its religious beliefs.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Last Chance to Repair Mr. Roberts' Obamacare Error; Liberty U. Challenges on Religious Liberty Grounds


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?