Popular Science Journalism: Facilitating Learning through Peer Review and Communication of Science News

By Tuten, Holly; Temesvari, Lesly | Journal of College Science Teaching, March-April 2013 | Go to article overview

Popular Science Journalism: Facilitating Learning through Peer Review and Communication of Science News


Tuten, Holly, Temesvari, Lesly, Journal of College Science Teaching


Educators have suggested using written assignments other than lab reports to increase science communication skills in students (Miele, 2010). Effective communication of research findings to professional and lay audiences is a critical attribute leading to lifelong success in scientific careers. Additionally, the development of science communication skills in nonscience majors (e.g., journalism) will help them become more effective science communicators while enhancing their scientific literacy. A course in science journalism, in which students research current science topics and write articles for public dissemination, facilitates student learning in an engaging way while teaching students critical communication skills.

By accessing the primary scientific literature independently and in group collaborations, students learn skills necessary for future success in research careers. Skills acquired include the ability to search and review, the ability to accurately interpret and communicate scientific findings, and the ability to learn independently. Through interpretation and critique of primary science literature, students develop critical-thinking skills that reinforce fundamental ideas underpinning the scientific method. Additionally, when writing with peer review in mind, and by practicing peer review, students increase their understanding of the audience and thus their communication skills.

Previously, an increase in student science literacy was demonstrated after incorporating journalism assignments into science courses (Hallowell & Holland, 1998). However, students in the classes requested more instruction in the genre of journalistic writing. At Clemson University in the 2011 spring and fall semesters, students participated in a Popular Science Journalism course with the stated objectives of (a) discussing, learning, and practicing the craft of writing science articles for a popular audience; (b) producing science news articles for the Clemson University newspaper, The Tiger; and (c) participating in the peer-review process.

Materials and methods

Students generated material for articles by accessing popular science news websites and blogs (e.g., Short Sharp Science at the New Scientist website), peer-reviewed science journals (e.g., Nature), and interviewing Clemson campus researchers. One article was produced every 2 weeks by each student, and one article per week was published in the school newspaper. At the end of each semester, all articles were compiled into a glossy magazine for distribution on and off campus. At the beginning of the second semester, "veteran" students (from the previous semester) were promoted to editorial and guidance roles.

The class met once per week for 2 hours. Course structure consisted of one or two short, directed lectures ([less than or equal to]30 minutes) and associated class exercises (see Figure 1), and group discussions with follow-up resources provided for independent student discovery (lectures were not given with each class meeting). Any remaining time (sometimes the entire class time) was devoted to writing. In the first semester, class activities were guided by an instructor; however, in the second semester, classes were led by the veteran students. There were no required readings, but texts available in the university library were suggested (Bauer & Bucchi 2007; Blum, Knudson, & Henig, 2006; Burkett, 1973; Murray, Schwartz, & Lichter, 2001).

Students were not assigned grades for typical items in a writing course such as grammar and spelling. Rather, to emphasize the necessity of deadlines in good science communication and effective peer review, students could only lose points for assignments turned in late.

An integral component of the course was peer review, with each student receiving one in-depth review of each article draft from a peer and the instructor. Additionally, all drafts were subject to a "roundtable review" method designed by students in the course; during a dedicated part of class time, each rough draft was sent to every other student in the group for approximately 5 minutes per person for a rapid group review. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Popular Science Journalism: Facilitating Learning through Peer Review and Communication of Science News
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.