The Social Construction of Caves and Rockshelters: Chauvet Cave (France) and Nawarla Gabarnmang (Australia)

By Delannoy, Jean-Jacques; David, Bruno et al. | Antiquity, March 2013 | Go to article overview

The Social Construction of Caves and Rockshelters: Chauvet Cave (France) and Nawarla Gabarnmang (Australia)


Delannoy, Jean-Jacques, David, Bruno, Geneste, Jean-Michel, Katherine, Margaret, Barker, Bryce, Whear, Ray L., Gunn, Robert G., Antiquity


Introduction

It is commonplace in archaeology to make reference to--and systematically investigate--site formation processes both natural and cultural (for a classic exposition, see Schiffer 1976). Among these investigations, it is not unusual, although less common, to focus attention on the way that a site's natural layout affected human activities--or how people made use of natural configurations in their daily lives. Examples include how geology and landform affect where people decide to live (e.g. Heydari 2007); the tendency for people to clean rockshelter floors by creating 'dump zones' toward the rear wall (e.g. Burns 2005); and the propensity for bedrock surfaces and ceilings to weather and exfoliate as a result of human habitation, especially firing practices (e.g. Hughes 1977). The ceiling height of rockshelters affects the movement of people and the layout of activity areas (e.g. Theunissen et al. 1998). Geology also influences the positioning of particular artistic designs, and the forms they take, as most famously exemplified by the spotted horse of Pech-Merle in France (e.g. Lorblanchet 2010). The natural layout of caves also structures social activities as these relate to various levels of liminality and sacredness, such as the painting of the most dangerous faunal taxa, and humans and other special anthropomorphic beings in the deepest and least accessible parts of French Upper Palaeolithic caves (e.g. Leroi-Gourhan 1965).

However, while caves and rockshelters may be recognised as negotiated spaces, they are rarely, if ever, treated as constructed architecture. This is despite a rich literature on dwelling and inhabitation perspectives in the social construction of the landscape (e.g. Ingold 1993; Thomas 2008) and the phenomenology of place (e.g. Tilley 1994). While such approaches to the archaeology of place have been the subject of a burgeoning literature on social interpretations of open landscapes and landscape features (e.g. Van Dyke 2008), they have not had major impacts on archaeological investigations of caves and rockshelters (for classic views of the social construction of place, see Tuan 1977 and Casey 1993).

Amenagement

Archaeological research often brings together varied specialist fields. One such collaborating discipline is geomorphology, whose objective is to shed light on the processes that caused sediments to be where they are today. The use of specialised geomorphological mapping techniques, such as have been used for the study of rock art (e.g. Delannoy et al. 2001, 2004), offers the researcher an opportunity to think of the materiality of a site in a way that connects its different components via the notion of amenagement.

Taken from the French, amenagement concerns how people are actively engaged in the construction of a given place through dwelling and inhabitation (see Ingold 2000 for discussion of 'dwelling'; Thomas 2008 for 'inhabitation'). The rock walls and the open spaces within caves and rockshelters are included in a site's social fabric by the way people engage with them. Here amenagement is more than 'management' or 'refurbishment', for, unlike these latter concepts, it foregrounds the active social configuration of place as construction. Amenagement creates the place that is lived and engaged with, rather than simply improving a pre-existing place. In this context, rock art participates in such a process of construction and site formation, not through a transformation of natural rock into a culturally transformed canvas, but rather through a fluid engagement with space as an already meaningful realm that is liveable, owned, usable or otherwise transformable in a process of ongoing construction and 'house-keeping', a process at the core of amenagement.

The concept of amenagement, with its emphasis on social construction in the course of inhabitation, is particularly apt for exploring the history of sites in cross- cultural perspective, especially in Australia. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Social Construction of Caves and Rockshelters: Chauvet Cave (France) and Nawarla Gabarnmang (Australia)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.