Modern Political Views and the Emergence of Early Complex Societies in the Bronze Age Mediterranean

By Herrero, Borja Legarra | Antiquity, March 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Modern Political Views and the Emergence of Early Complex Societies in the Bronze Age Mediterranean


Herrero, Borja Legarra, Antiquity


Introduction

The Tea Party, the Arab Spring and the 'Occupy' movements may seem to have little in common. They respond to very different circumstances, and they are fuelled by very different ideologies. Furthermore, they do not represent homogeneous movements and each of them amalgamates very different groups with very different interests. Stripped of their most obvious traits, however, they share a common dissatisfaction with the nature of power in the present world, and each has opened a debate on the nature and legitimacy of current power structures.

Interestinffly, many of the questions raised by these movements are shared by the archaeological study of the early complex societies and first states in the Mediterranean Bronze Age: why did decision-making become the prerogative of a few over many? Was it a necessary step, or the result of the calculated promotion of this few over the rest? The fact that two such different debates involve comparable questions highlights the fact that modern political views about power and the study of the past are intrinsically connected (Tilley 1990; McGuire 2008), much more than archaeologists in the Mediterranean have normally been willing to admit. Indeed, only recently has the political charge of our studies of early complex societies in the Mediterranean begun to be explored (Lull & Mico 2011), bringing into focus many ideological assumptions that have slipped into our research unnoticed.

The mere question, 'are unequal power structures necessary or not?', throws us deep into the many political connotations of the archaeology of early complex societies. Recently, Lull and Mico have reminded us ofa point that was made 30 years ago by Gilman: while most of Anglo-American archaeological academia interpret the appearance of complex socio-political systems as a necessary and positive change, such change can be alternatively interpreted as having provided very restricted benefits for the majority of the population (Gilman 1981, 1990, 2001; Lull & Mico 2011). The pertinence of opening such debate is supported by modern ethnographic work that is still trying to understand who exactly benefits from the creation and maintenance of unequal power structures (Wiessner 2002, 2009; Hayden & Villeneuve 2010). There are therefore, two paradigms for the understanding of novel complex societies in the Bronze Age that have significant ideological and political repercussions. Each paradigm is deeply embedded in the historiography of two classical case studies on state formation in the Mediterranean: the Aegean and south-east Iberia.

Modern political views and the emergence of early complex societies in the Bronze Age Mediterranean

Good for the Aegean, bad for Iberia

In the last 40 years of study in the Aegean, the assumption that change was necessary, accumulative, positive and, more importantly, beneficiai for most of the population (Hamilakis 2002) has been the corner stone for most studies inthe region. Renfrew's study of the third-millennium Aegean published in 1972 (Renfrew 1972) presented society as a welloiled system in which its various components are seen to interact in a reciprocal, beneficial way. Changes are positive and are built within the systemic structure, and therefore are not traumatic. Different social and economic roles work in unison, in a process of feedback that continues to evolve towards increasing complexity. Growth was the natural outcome of such a system.

In the 1970s and 1980s this positive view was maintained in the study of the Aegean. Managerial models presented chiefs as necessary to organise society (Branigan 1987) and to help tackle inherent problems such as growing demographic pressure. The development of successful risk buffering strategies to cope with the uncertainties of the Mediterranean climate has also been argued as a positive motor for social, economic and political changes (Halstead 1988, 1995).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Modern Political Views and the Emergence of Early Complex Societies in the Bronze Age Mediterranean
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?