Qualitative Client-Based Research: Tools for Planning: A Plan That Makes Use of Qualitative Client-Based Research Should Be Far Richer and More Robust Than Would Otherwise Be the Case

By McIntyre, Chuck | Planning for Higher Education, July-September 2012 | Go to article overview

Qualitative Client-Based Research: Tools for Planning: A Plan That Makes Use of Qualitative Client-Based Research Should Be Far Richer and More Robust Than Would Otherwise Be the Case


McIntyre, Chuck, Planning for Higher Education


Introduction

The research supporting most strategic planning in colleges and universities relies on a dual thrust: scanning external conditions ("what should we be doing?") and evaluating internal operations ("how well do we do what we do?"). This duality has characterized higher education strategic planning since it was effectively described by Keller (1983).

For American community (two-year) colleges, this planning methodology means conducting elaborate "scans" of the external environment--trends in community or service area demographics and socioeconomics, competitors, and local cultural change--along with the usual evaluation of internal operations. (See, for example, Knoell and McIntyre [1974] and McIntyre [2004, 2008a].)

This work relies largely on quantitative rather than qualitative metrics and tends to be lean on input from the college's clients: students and community constituents (trustees, students' parents, alumni, and others) who are touched by the several-part mission of the institution.

Moreover, most data about students and their behavior are quantitative (yield, enrollment, retention, and the like) and/or come from student "satisfaction" surveys that rely on a Likert-type scale response. Surveys by firms like Noel-Levitz and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) are popular examples. The accountability movement has produced a plethora of such surveys, leading to what Lipka (2011) describes as survey "fatigue" and resulting in low (less than one-third) and often incomplete responses.

These surveys also pose other problems. An overall Likert scale response value of 3.5 (when 5 = "highly" and 1 = "not at all" satisfied) does not reveal much in the way of useful inferences unless benchmarked against a different student group, the same group at an earlier point in time, or students at another (hopefully comparable) institution. But even then, there is little insight into the real cause of a condition or problem (if there is one) and much less into a possible solution.

To gain input from other clients in the community, colleges typically employ advisory committees. However, by statute or regulation, these groups most often deliberate on narrow issues like specific career training programs, developing little evidence that can be used to formulate major planning strategies.

This article builds on the idea that standard strategic planning should be supplemented by qualitative research-in this case, two techniques commonly used in marketing and the social sciences: focus groups and ethnographic research. After briefly describing the two methods, the author describes his use of these tools at two community colleges:

* Focus groups in 2009 at College A in the Midwest

* Ethnographic research in 2006 on students at College B in the Southwest

Focus Groups

Focus groups began to be used soon after World War II to evaluate radio programming and have evolved for use in social and health research along with all kinds of marketing. They are a form of interviewing that relies on interaction within the group to allow participants to question each other and reconsider their own understandings of the topic(s) under discussion (Lindlof and Taylor 2002). The group leader (researcher) can directly question and follow up on participants' observations, probing a topic if necessary (e.g., "say more" is a typical segue).

A focus group is described by Merton and Kendall (1946) as consisting of individuals who have experience with or an opinion on the topic(s) under examination and who are subject to a predetermined set of questions. Or, as defined by Krueger and Casey (2000, p. 5), a focus group is "a carefully planned series of discussions designed to obtain perceptions on a defined area of interest in a permissive, non-threatening environment." Thus, focus groups seek to uncover attitudes, feelings, experiences, and beliefs not easily elicited by observation, one-on-one interviews, or questionnaire surveys. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Qualitative Client-Based Research: Tools for Planning: A Plan That Makes Use of Qualitative Client-Based Research Should Be Far Richer and More Robust Than Would Otherwise Be the Case
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.