EPA Slams State over Pipeline Review; Seeks Deeper Environmental Analysis before Decision on Keystone XL Fate

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 24, 2013 | Go to article overview

EPA Slams State over Pipeline Review; Seeks Deeper Environmental Analysis before Decision on Keystone XL Fate


Byline: Ben Wolfgang, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Obama administration has heard from plenty of critics over its handling - and endless delays - of the Keystone XL pipeline.

But now it's taking fire from its own Environmental Protection Agency, which is blasting the State Department for an insufficient review of the massive Canada-to-Texas oil sands project. The EPA contends that the State Department, and the Obama administration as a whole, must take a deeper environmental look at Keystone before making a final decision.

The filing, offered on the final day that the State Department accepted public comments on the project, is a key victory for environmentalists in their fight to stop the $7 billion pipeline.

Specifically, the EPA is taking aim at last month's State Department environmental review of the project. The draft study found that, among other positives, there would be no significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions if Keystone goes forward.

The EPA is disputing that claim and many others in the 2,000-page State Department review. In its public comments, the agency says it has environmental objections based on insufficient information and that more research is needed.

The environmental community praised the EPA's move, which may be a signal that presidential approval of Keystone is no longer a safe bet.

The EPA has got it exactly right - the State Department's draft environmental review of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline is inadequate, said Anthony Swift, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, a vocal opponent of the project. The EPA determined that the Keystone XL would have significant negative environmental impacts.

There have been about 1 million comments submitted to the State Department, which closed its nearly two-month feedback period at the close of business Monday.

The next step is for State to review those comments and, sometime in the late summer or early fall, issue a determination on whether Keystone is in the national interest.

State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell didn't directly address the EPA filing, but did say additional work will be done before the environmental review is finalized. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

EPA Slams State over Pipeline Review; Seeks Deeper Environmental Analysis before Decision on Keystone XL Fate
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.