Abolishing Obsolete Crown Prerogatives Relating to the Military

By McBain, Graham | Nottingham Law Journal, Annual 2011 | Go to article overview

Abolishing Obsolete Crown Prerogatives Relating to the Military


McBain, Graham, Nottingham Law Journal


INTRODUCTION

In Britain today, there is concern at the loss of authority of Parliament. There is also the problem of how well Parliament and the Crown inter-relate in modern times. A vast number of decisions are taken in the name of that mysterious, and amorphous, entity: 'the Crown.' (1) Legal rights specific to the Crown are denominated its 'prerogatives' (2) and they are said to derive from the common law. (3) They used to be intimately connected with the sovereign in person since, in medieval times, the sovereign and the Crown were, in the eyes of the law, virtually one and the same. Today, however, the role of the sovereign is almost wholly ceremonial. Her rights remain, but they have drained away into the wider concept of the Crown: the apparatus of government and bureaucracy that operates in her name but over which she has little (or no) control. (4) Thus, there is legal fiction and reality: something prevalent with regard to the British constitution. (5)

Crown prerogatives have been described as residual rights. (6) That is, legal rights (7) not otherwise transferred (usually by legislation) to other institutions and individuals. Historically, the Crown asserted such rights when the sovereign was more powerful than Parliament. Today, these Crown prerogatives tend not only to detract from individual human rights; they also detract from the authority of Parliament. Crown prerogatives are often categorised into a number of discrete areas, viz. the rights of the Crown in relation to the: military; justice; Parliament; Church of England; commerce; revenue; land, honours and dignities; and miscellaneous. (8)

This article considers certain Crown subsidiary prerogatives relating to military matters. These prerogatives are 'executive' as opposed to 'personal' prerogatives. That is, they would be exercised today (if at all) by ministers and not by the Queen in person. It asserts that they are obsolete. If they were abolished, this would enable a clearer analysis of whether the sovereign (and the Crown in the wider sphere) should retain any responsibility over the military at all or whether it would be better for Parliament to have control over the same. In considering this topic, it may be noted there were few early legal treatises dedicated to the Crown prerogative. (9) The principal ones comprise:

(a) Staunford, Exposition of the King's Prerogative (1607); (10)

(b) Hale, The Prerogatives of the King (written c 1640's) (11) and

(c) Chitty, Prerogatives of the Crown (1820). (12)

Although the Abridgments (major and minor) (13) contain some material on the Crown prerogatives, of greater use are Coke, (14) Blackstone (15) and Halsbury. (16) There are also modern texts on constitutional law (17) and history (18) albeit these make scant reference to the prerogatives considered in this article.

PREROGATIVE TO DECLARE WAR AND PEACE

Crown prerogatives in respect of military matters stem from the legal proposition that the sovereign has the legal right (prerogative) to declare war and peace, both within, and outside, the realm. This has long been held. (19) Sir Thomas Smith, in his De Republica Anglorum, written c 1562-5, stated the position firmly (20) and, in 1765, Blackstone observed:

   [T]he king has ... the sole prerogative of making war and peace.
   For it is held by all the writers on the law of nature and nations,
   that the right of making war, which by nature subsisted in every
   individual, is given up by all private persons that enter into
   society, and is vested in the sovereign power: (21) and this right is
   given up not only by individuals, but even by the entire body of
   people, that are under the dominion of a sovereign. It would indeed
   be extremely improper, that any number of subjects should have the
   power of binding the supreme magistrate, and putting him against
   his will in a state of war. (22)

Halsbury, citing Blackstone, states: "War can be commenced or terminated only by the authority of the crown. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Abolishing Obsolete Crown Prerogatives Relating to the Military
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.