When Is a Director Not a Director?

By Moffatt, Paula | Nottingham Law Journal, Annual 2011 | Go to article overview

When Is a Director Not a Director?


Moffatt, Paula, Nottingham Law Journal


Holland (Respondent) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) and another [2010] UKSC 51 (Lord Hope, Deputy President, Lords Walker, Collins, Clarke and Saville)

THE FACTS

This was a highly complex case in which section 212 Insolvency Act 1986 ("section 212") applications had been brought against Mr Michael Holland and his wife by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs ("HMRC") on the basis that, as de facto directors of 42 insolvent companies, they had been guilty of misfeasance and breaches of duty in causing the payment of in excess of 13[pounds sterling] million of unlawful dividends between 2002 and 2004 when the companies had insufficient distributable reserves to pay their creditors. (1)

The 42 companies (the "composite companies") had been set up to administer the business and tax affairs of contractors who did not want to set up and run their own companies. Each composite company had a sole, corporate director, Paycheck (Directors Services) Limited ("Paycheck Directors"). Paycheck Directors was a wholly owned subsidiary of Paycheck Services Limited ("Paycheck Services") and was owned by Mr and Mrs Holland, each of whom held 50% of its shares. Mr and Mrs Holland were also both directors of Paycheck Directors.

Each of the composite companies had a voting share (held by another Paycheck company ultimately owned by Mr and Mrs Holland) and 50 non-voting shares which were held by the contractors who became employees of the composite companies. The services of the shareholder/employees were contracted out by the composite companies which, in return, received an income.

Each composite company paid (i) a fee to Paycheck Services for the provision of administrative services; (ii) a salary to each shareholder/employee; and (iii) after making provision for the payment of corporation tax at the small companies rate, a dividend to each shareholder employee.

Dividends were paid on a regular basis. A computer programme generated a document purporting to be a minute of a directors' meeting of the relevant composite company which recorded that "M Holland Paycheck (Directors Services) Ltd" had been present at the meeting and that the directors of the composite company had resolved to pay a dividend of a specified amount to a be distributed to a specified shareholder/employee.

The composite companies were part of a corporate structure which had been deliberately created to be tax efficient: provided that each company kept its profits below 300,000[pounds sterling] (which they all did) each company would, individually, pay the lower, small companies rate of corporation tax rather than higher rate corporation tax.

There was, however, a flaw in this structure which had not been spotted when it was established. As Mr Holland was in control of the companies (because he held one share in each of them and each share carried voting rights), they fell to be treated as associated" companies for the purposes of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. This meant that because the collective turnover of the composite companies exceeded 300,000,[pounds sterling] each composite company was liable to pay higher rate corporation tax. Dividends had been paid after provision had been made only for corporation tax at the lower rate. This meant that there was a substantial deficiency in each composite company's higher rate corporation tax liability. The composite companies went into administration in October 2004 and later into liquidation.

HMRC, which was the only creditor of each of the insolvent composite companies, sought orders requiring Mr and Mrs Holland to contribute over 3-5[pounds sterling] million to the assets of the insolvent composite companies by way of compensation in respect of their misfeasance and breach of duty.

At first instance, the claims against Mrs Holland were dismissed, but Mr Holland was found to be a de facto director of each of the composite companies and so was answerable to HMRC's claims under section 212. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

When Is a Director Not a Director?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.