The Global Land Rush: Markets, Rights, and the Politics of Food

By Narula, Smita | Stanford Journal of International Law, Winter 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Global Land Rush: Markets, Rights, and the Politics of Food


Narula, Smita, Stanford Journal of International Law


In the past five years, interest in purchasing and leasing agricultural land in developing countries has skyrocketed. This trend, which was facilitated by the 2008 food crisis, is led by state and private investors, both domestic and foreign. Investors are responding to a variety of global forces: Some are securing their own food supply, while others are capitalizing on land as an increasingly promising source of financial returns. Proponents argue that these investments can support economic development in host states while boosting global food roduction. But critics charge that these "land grabs" disregard land users' rights and further marginalize already vulnerable groups." small-scale farmers, pastoralists, and indigenous peoples who are being displaced from their land and from resources essential to their survival. Amid mounting global protests, two dominant frameworks have emerged to assess and contest the global rush for agricultural land. This Article critically examines both approaches.

Part I provides an overview of the drivers and impacts of large-scale land transfers and the problematic land transactions involved. Part II sets out the contours of what I term the market-plus approach and the rights based approach--the frameworks assumed respectively by proponents and opponents of these deals. Part III analyzes key conceptual differences in each framework's approach to rights and risks and to land distribution. I argue that the market-plus approach tolerates and facilitates rights violations, whereas the rights-based approach sets a normative baseline that repudiates these impacts and addresses key distributive concerns. Part III assesses the potential of each approach to effectively regulate land deals in practice. I find that both approaches emphasize procedural safeguards to protect land users' rights and argue that these safeguards" are ineffective at contesting the power dynamics at play in land transactions. Part IV proposes concrete reforms to help empower communities most affected by land deals and argues that international actors must be more involved in securing rights protections.

INTRODUCTION

I.  LARGE-SCALE LAND TRANSFERS: DRIVERS, TRANSACTIONS, AND IMPACTS

    A. Drivers and Actors Behind Large-Scale Land Transfers
    B. Land Transfers and Transactions: Documented Problems
    C. Negative Impacts on Host Communities

II. CONTESTING THE GLOBAL LAND RUSH: MARKET VS. RIGHTS-BASED APPROACHES

    A. The Market-Plus Approach
    1. The Market-Plus Approach to Land: Land as a Commodity
    2. "Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment that
         Respects Rights, Livelihoods and Resources"

    B. The Rights-Based Approach
    1. The Rights-Based Approach to Land: Land as a Gateway to
         Human Rights

2. "Eleven Principles: Minimum Human Rights Principles
         Applicable to Large-scale Land Acquisitions or Leases"

III. ASSESSING THE FRAMEWORKS: PRINCIPAL DISTINCTIONS AND
     OVERLAPPING PROBLEMS

    A. Principal Distinctions: Rights, Risks, and Land Distribution
    1. Risks vs. Rights Violations
    a. Framing and its Consequences
    b. Repudiating Rights Violations and Managing Trade-Offs
    c. Addressing Distributive Concerns and Managing Conflicts
          Between Rights Holders
    2. Land Markets and Land Distribution
    a. The Market-Plus Approach: Enhancing Productivity or
          Exacerbating Problems?
    b. The Rights-Based Approach: Making the Case for Agrarian
          Reforms
    B. Overlapping Problems: The Limitations of Procedural Safeguards
    1. The RAI Principles: A Misplaced Focus on Procedural Fairness
    2. The Eleven Principles: Procedural Means for Substantive Ends
    3. A Critical Challenge: Generating Political Will

IV. EMPOWERING AFFECTED COMMUNITIES

    A. Resistance Strategies and the Need for Structural Support
    B. Restricting and Regulating Large-Scale Land Transfers
    C. Reforming our Approach to Land: A Framework for the Future

CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

In 2011, Saudi Star PLC leased roughly 25,000 acres of Ethiopia's most fertile farmland from the Ethiopian government to produce rice for export to the Middle East.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Global Land Rush: Markets, Rights, and the Politics of Food
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?