Ad Hoc Reparation Mechanisms

By Piacibello, Julien | Houston Journal of International Law, Winter 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Ad Hoc Reparation Mechanisms


Piacibello, Julien, Houston Journal of International Law


  I. INTRODUCTION--THE IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL
     LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND SPECIFIC MECHANISMS FOR
     ENSURING INDIVIDUALS' ACCESS TO REPARATION

 II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AD HOC REPARATION
     MECHANISMS AS A PARTIAL REMEDY TO HARM AND
     LOSSES RELATED TO A SITUATION OF ARMED CONFLICT

III. THE EXAMPLES OF KOSOVO AND BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA
     A. Mandates and Powers of the Commissions
     B. Successes and challenges

 IV. CONCLUSION

I. INTRODUCTION--THE IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND SPECIFIC MECHANISMS FOR ENSURING INDIVIDUALS' ACCESS TO REPARATION

A State's obligation to make reparations for international law violations is a recognized general principle (1) found in specific provisions of international humanitarian law instruments. (2) However, in the absence of appropriate national legal frameworks and reparation mechanisms, national courts have generally rejected individual claims for redress for violations of international humanitarian law. (3)

The recognition of a State's direct liability vis-a-vis individuals for violations of international humanitarian law in national courts has both substantive and procedural obstacles. (4)

When rejecting cases for substantive reasons, national courts have told claimants that the right to reparation as found in international humanitarian law was not self-executing, and therefore, only the home States of the victims were directly entitled to this right. (5) This rationale was referred to again recently in the judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy); (6) the Court noted:

   [A]gainst the background of a century of practice in
   which almost every peace treaty or post-war settlement
   has involved either a decision not to require the
   payment of reparations or the use of lump sum
   settlements and set-offs, it is difficult to see that
   international law contains a rule requiring the payment
   of full compensation to each and every individual as a
   rule accepted by the international community of States
   as a whole as one from which no derogation is
   permitted. (7)

This observation of the Court also recalls another rationale that has been put forward by national courts for rejecting individuals' claims grounded on alleged violations of the laws of armed conflict, namely the existence of peace agreements interpreted as precluding these claims. (8)

When national courts have rejected claims on procedural grounds, they have almost consistently deemed that the rule of State immunity excluded acts committed by the armed forces of a foreign State during wartime from their jurisdiction (ratione materiae). (9) State immunity, "adopted as a general rule of customary international law solidly rooted in the practice of States[,]" (10) obliges States to "refrain from exercising jurisdiction in a proceeding before [their] courts against another State." (11) The scope and source, hence the legal regime, of this procedural rule in the international order, is still at the centre of debates among scholars and jurists. At stake is notably the applicability of (or the possibility for the forum State to waive) State immunity in case of alleged grave violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. (12) For the purpose of these introductive remarks, I will simply observe that the scope of State immunity in current international customary law, based on a tentative lowest common denominator of very heterogeneous national practices, remains broad and uncertain. International doctrine and States' practice made State immunity applicable only to acts of sovereign power (acta jure imperii), by opposition to acts of management carried out by a State acting as a private person (acta jure gestionis), but this distinction itself has proven to be problematic. (13) Moreover, developments in national laws and international instruments have questioned the relevance of this distinction as the main criterion for the application of State immunity.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Ad Hoc Reparation Mechanisms
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?