Tensions in Incorporating Global Childhood with Early Childhood Programs: The Case of South Africa

By Ebrahim, Hasina | Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, September 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Tensions in Incorporating Global Childhood with Early Childhood Programs: The Case of South Africa


Ebrahim, Hasina, Australasian Journal of Early Childhood


Introduction

The concept of global childhood used in this article refers to an essentialist, homogenising and standardised view of childhood which privileges western ideals (Nieuwenhuys, 2010) and attaches limitations to the human experience. Human advancement is viewed in terms of progression towards Euro-American traditions and practices (Nsameneng, 2008; Marfo, 2011). The concept finds expression in the majority world through a variety of intervention programs undertaken largely by non-governmental organisations (NGOs) funded by international donor organisations that mostly aim at mobilising the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). Child development textbooks of Euro-American origins, electronic and learning exchanges, conferences and partnerships between minority and majority world institutions further enhance the export value of global childhood.

The uptake of concepts associated with global childhood has the power to enable a more just distribution of opportunities for young children and their families on a worldwide scale. It also allows for bolder generalisations to be made about the conditions of young children's lives. Global childhood also makes salient the fact that all children have similar needs which makes them dependent on those entrusted for shaping their road to adulthood.

While positive aspects of ideas and concepts associated with global childhood are noted, this article provides insight into its contested nature with the specific aim of encouraging critical exchange of ideas, reflection and debate by practitioners, academics and students in the field. As a stimulus in this direction, Nieuwenhuys (2010, pp. 294-295) warns that scholars have time and again remarked 'that childhood has become a trope now circulating globally to be imposed on the entire world at the expense of other ideals and experiences'. In interrogating the definition of childhood, Nieuwenhuys asks whose definition counts. Is it the one of the international community 'armed with international conventions, a body of knowledge and specialists, media spectacles and an array of symbolic goods--or fragmentary, fleeting and contradictory ideas and practices that are part and parcel of the business of real-life people crafting a future for the next generation'? (Nieuwenhuys, 2010, pp. 294-295). Okwany, Ngutuku and Muhangi (2009) also question top-down approaches which make assumptions about people's needs. They encourage us to ask: Whose early childhood development (ECD)? Whose good start? This line of questioning is particularly important, taking into account the history of early childhood programs in Africa.

Tracing the power and effects of global childhood in Africa

The work of Prochner and Kabiru (2008) is helpful in understanding how a certain version of early childhood was exported through British colonisation into Africa. In tracing the history of formal early childhood programs in Africa, the authors note how a foreign way of educating young children gained currency. The missionary schools, developed during the nineteenth century, were strongly influenced by western ideas of childhood, race, education and religion. The main aims were the conversion of the indigenous people to Christianity and gaining support for a European worldview. The latter promoted an individualist culture as opposed to collective ways of knowing and living. The infant schools based on the British model took a rigid academic approach for early civilisation of children of indigenous people. Over time, kindergarten and the nursery schools developed as limited non-academic options for young children. The civilising attempts of these models were powerful and contested the culture, values and traditions related to child care and early socialisation of children in families and communities.

Decades of change in the world order and its effect on political, economic and social structures have shaped ideas and concepts associated with global childhood.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Tensions in Incorporating Global Childhood with Early Childhood Programs: The Case of South Africa
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?