Comparing the Approaches of the Presidential Candidates

Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Comparing the Approaches of the Presidential Candidates

Ms. ANDERSEN: I am very pleased to welcome today two individuals who are representatives of the two candidates. They both want me to be very clear, they are not officially representing the campaign for the candidates, but they both have long and close ties to the two camps, and they know their positions well and will reflect them well, I am sure.

So, first, I would like to introduce, taking the position on the left here, Professor Bill Burke-White, who is Deputy Dean and Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and has most recently, between 2009 and 2011, served as a member of the policy planning staff at the U.S. State Department in the Obama Administration under Secretary Clinton. And there, among many other things, he was a principal drafter of the Administration's Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, so a very important document that sets out this Administration's foreign policy priorities and approach. So, Bill, go ahead and assume the position there.

And then on the right here, I would like to welcome Ambassador Pierre Prosper, who is currently of counsel at Arent Fox, but previously served in a number of positions in public life as a prosecutor for the United States, a prosecutor at the Rwanda Tribunal, and as the ambassador for wax crimes issues in the Bush Administration. He has also been an advisor to the Romney campaign and will be representing that perspective here. And I am going to play Gwen Eiffel in the middle.

Our format is going to be relatively informal, debate style. I am going to pose some questions to each of the two representatives, hopefully try to find the fault lines, and spark a little debate between them. After we have three or four questions and discussion of those among us, we will open it up to the floor and welcome your questions as well. And I understand, timekeepers, that we are allowed to go a little bit over, so indulge us. We were only allotted 30 minutes, and we have lots to talk about.

Let me start with a general framing question about the candidates' approach to presidential power and foreign policy, and I will start with you, Bill. We have had a discussion today--and this has been a critique that we heard elsewhere, too--that in terms of exerting the presidential authority in foreign affairs, many have characterized the Obama Administration as representing more similarities to the prior Bush Administration than differences. Do you think that that's a fair and accurate characterization, and would you expect to see any difference in a second Obama Administration? Are we going to have a little bit more flexing of muscles when you don't face re-election, or will the president be the ultimate lame duck?

PROF. BURKE-WHITE: So thanks for the question, and four years ago it was great fun, right? We were on all these policy teams, you know, dreaming up policy for then Senator and candidate Obama.

Now, as Pierre and I were just remarking, I am constrained because I am in a sense representing administration policy because that is, in fact, the president's campaign platform, which does sort of narrow how one can respond on some of these issues. I would also say that four years ago I was perhaps more of a naive academic, who could tell you all of the reasons that presidential power was too inflated and was a dangerous thing. And then I got to government and quickly said that, well, where is that presidential power that we thought the Bush Administration had and realized that there is an awful lot more constraint than, as perhaps academics, we had once argued. So that, again, kind of constrains me.

Jack Goldsmith this morning, I think, answered that question better than perhaps I possibly could, but let me try to focus on the question of what we might see differently going forward, and I think the things that will drive possible differences are less internal, less, you know, policy shifts than they are external.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Comparing the Approaches of the Presidential Candidates


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?