In Women's Health Week, Time to Take Stock

By Christian, Sam | The Florida Times Union, May 15, 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

In Women's Health Week, Time to Take Stock


Christian, Sam, The Florida Times Union


Byline: Sam Christian

There's no better time for women to take stock of their health.

We're in the midst of National Women's Health Week, May 12-18, an effort by the U.S. Department of Health's Office on Women's Health to encourage women to make health a priority.

The good news is that over the last 40 years, the overall health of U.S. women has improved greatly, according to federal government statistics. Still, there's room for improvement.

Many changes in women's medicine and health services in the decades since the sexual revolution of the 1960s responded to the changing demands on women who are busier than ever as working mothers, single parents, engaged civic-minded volunteers and/or entrepreneurs who are postponing pregnancy.

Medical technology, pharmaceuticals and even the office hours offered today by many gynecologists and obstetricians are in response to modern women's fast-paced lives. A number of physicians now offer same-day appointments, lunchtime and extended office hours to accommodate hectic schedules.

Women today also have a lot more input in their health choices than in the old days when doctors were treated as gods. Our job is to give patients accurate information to help them make decisions on treatment options.

In my opinion, the most revolutionary development in women's medicine since the introduction of hormone replacement therapy in the 1940s and "The Pill" for contraception in 1960, was the introduction of laparoscopic surgical technology in the 1970s.

This minimally invasive surgical technology enables doctors to diagnose or treat in-office or in an outpatient setting a number of women's health problems that previously were done in a hospital and might have required hospitalization for several days or longer. Not only is laparascopy more cost-effective, but it also provides in most cases quicker recovery times. Other advantages include less pain - and less pain medication - less hemorrhaging and less likelihood of infection. Surgical procedures are less traumatic for patients as a result of such tehnological advances.

Laparoscopic surgery requires just one or two small incisions in the pelvic or abdominal cavity through which a telescopic rod with surgical tools, video imaging equipment and fiber optic lighting is inserted. The method is also used for diagnostics, such as determining whether issues with reproductive organs are the cause of infertility, whether pelvic pain is due to cysts, fibroids or endometriosis (cells that grow in the pelvic area outside the uterus and can cause pain and painful intercourse). This technology is used in treatment for endometriosis, ectopic pregnancy (an embryo growing outside the uterine cavity) and ovarian cysts.

Some of the disadvantages of this method for surgeons, such as depth perception and range of motion, are addressed by the newer robotic surgical technology. Physicians are able to do many more things using robotics because of incredible 3-D (high definition) optics and three working channels, plus the computerized stabilization feature that addresses vibrations and shaky hands.

Robotics has not been without controversy, as mentioned in recent news stories. It can cost more than laparoscopic surgery or more invasive procedures, according to a Columbia University study. Critics cite cases of inadvertent injuries to other organs and claim injuries are underreported. But defenders of robotics say the technology is only as good as the surgeon using it and inadvertent injuries can occur using any surgical procedure. Hospitals and their medical staff credential doctors who can use this equipment and ultimately determine which doctors are qualified for each procedure.

Medicine is an imperfect and ever-evolving science. Some of the serious stumbles over the last 40 years in new products, procedures and approaches to women's health care resulted in:

- Food and Drug Administration warnings in 1971 about using a synthetic form of estrogen to prevent miscarriage because of vaginal cancer risks for daughters of users.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

In Women's Health Week, Time to Take Stock
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?