Environmental Geology Projects Success Improvement

By Lajczykova, Marketa; Zgodavova, Kristina | Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, May 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Environmental Geology Projects Success Improvement

Lajczykova, Marketa, Zgodavova, Kristina, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management


"Let your customer create your success"--Barkley & Saylor

It is known that the project managers face various problems in each project. Generally these problems are with time, finances and quality. The main task of the project manager is to identify problems before they affect the project results and know how to deal with them should they happen.

Classification of projects that fall outside the scope of research and development according to (Frascati, 2002) and (Reynolds, 2012) are as follows:

* Civil Engineering, Construction, Petrochemical, Mining and Quarrying Projects;

* Manufacturing Projects;

* Management Projects.

Projects of the first and second type leave larger or smaller environmental loads and then management projects often have to deal with them.

In the context of "sustainable thinking" the European Commission has proposed a new Environment Action Programme for the EU, entitled "Living well, within the limits of our planet". This, supposedly, will guide policy environment up to 2020 (Potocnik, 2012). This proposal aims to enhance Europe's ecological resilience and transform the EU into an inclusive and sustainable green economy. The concepts of environmental and social aspects of sustainability, energy challenge, and social responsibility are very important for our future (Frost, 2012). It follows that the role of organisations involved in projects related to geological loads will grow in the future significantly.

The starting points for this paper are the specific findings in the "case" organisation which are mostly related to ambiguity of information and complexity of change management in projects.

The purpose of the paper is to present the possibility of improving the processes and workresults of project organisations providing services in the field of geology, but the results are universally applicable and can be applied to similar organisations that use project management principles to manage their complicated contracts.

The methodological basis for the paper is both the Customer Driven Project Management (CDPM) (Barkley & Saylor, 2001) method and the tools and methods used in quality engineering and quality management, which are applied to projects related to geological services.

Barkley and Saylor (2001) noted that project quality management "is the process of integrating and managing quality into the core project management process rather than using quality tools simply to inspect and appraise the work after the fact."


Research methodology is based on an analysis of existing projects in the organisation providing services in the field of environmental geology with the aid of case studies, from which, a universal model was prepared for further research this issue. Case studies relate to contracts in the field of geological services, specifically, in its Environmental Geology Division (EGD). During 2010-2012, major projects aimed at solving past environmental burdens were monitored. Geology is the essential part of this project. In 2010, further research developed the united algorithm for the situations awareness and improvement of projects success (S) modified by (Zgodavova & Slimak, 2011) and thus improved the Quality (Q), Effectiveness (E), Efficiency (I) and traceability (T). This step was based on the review of project documentation and subsequent processing of the case studies. Defining project success is often associated with: "deliver outcomes on time and on budget". But are those really the success factors that are most important to the customer in the case of environmental projects? Delivering a successful environmental project starts with taking a step back and understanding business drivers of the organisation and environmental impacts to the society.

In the case of projects, it is more suitable to replace the term Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) according to ISO 9004:2009 with the term Key Success Indicators (KSI) as a common term for criteria used to measure the benefits (financial and non-financial) of a project.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Environmental Geology Projects Success Improvement


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?