Happiness Institutions

By Nou, Jennifer | Duke Law Journal, May 2013 | Go to article overview

Happiness Institutions


Nou, Jennifer, Duke Law Journal


INTRODUCTION

Happiness measures, like any decisionmaking criteria, will not reside in sterile vacuums, but rather will thrive within policymaking institutions. Appreciating the dynamics within and between these bodies thus can help to illuminate further dimensions of the subjective well-being (SWB) debate. This Commentary seeks to bring those institutional considerations to the foreground. Its principal argument is that happiness measures necessarily implicate issues of deep disagreement that must be resolved by legitimate actors and procedures before such measures can be implemented. Given the current lack of methodological consensus, individual agencies should thus experiment with such measures in discrete rulemakings when the available well-being data are robust and could usefully supplement a rule's cost-benefit analysis (CBA). Only then, through learning and experience, should other government actors consider institutionalizing happiness measures through their respective processes and governing texts. (1) Each stage of this dynamic process, in turn--within agencies, the executive branch, Congress, and the courts--promises distinct sources of information and legitimacy.

The articles, Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis (2) and Happiness Surveys and Public Policy: Wkat's the Use?, (3) offer rich insights into many of the contentious issues endemic to SWB research. In the former paper, John Bronsteen, Christopher Buccafusco, and Jonathan Masur propose a method that they call well-being analysis (WBA) as a "hedonized" counterpart to CBA and consider its operation in practice. (4) Matthew Adler's contribution is valuable for highlighting, among other things, the role of the "observer" in happiness measurement. (5) Specifically, he points out that when observers have diverging rankings of preference profiles, "objective" frameworks such as measures of gross national happiness can only be "observer-relative." (6) Such inevitable variations, he fears, will lead to "arbitrary" conclusions about so-called "objective happiness." (7)

The potential for arbitrariness, however, should not in itself doom the enterprise; it counsels only that pretensions to pure objectivity can be shed. In their place should operate familiar and evolving principles of administrative law and institutional processes that help to ensure that such arbitrariness is appropriately cabined. Part I surveys potential sources of deep disagreements regarding SWB that prevent consensus on its policymaking role. Part II compares an array of institutional mechanisms for resolving those disagreements in the analogous context of CBA. Part III then explores the reasons why the best initial mechanisms for implementing SWB measures reside at the individual agency level, when they can supplement the CBA of particular rules.

I. DEEP DISAGREEMENTS

If long-running cost-benefit debates are any indication, there are multiple dimensions along which SWB experts will be unlikely to find universal agreement in the near future. (8) These areas of deep disagreement may arise for multiple reasons. Perhaps they implicate questions about the ends rather than the means of government. (9) Or perhaps they require second-order measurement specifications that are essentially contestable. (10) Or perhaps they require incommensurable tradeoffs between the monetized and nonmonetized, the quantitative and the qualitative. All of these possibilities threaten intractability for academics and government actors alike. At the same time, there may be deep disagreements about whether these disputes are even deep at all; some will argue that sufficient conceptual or technical refinement will reveal them to be quite shallow; others will remain skeptical. This Part surveys a few of these sources of disagreement, but there are many more.

A. Ends, Not Means

Whether the government should promote overall life satisfaction, or positive experiences, or the obtainment of objective goods "is a matter for substantive normative argument.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Happiness Institutions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.