Lifting the Organisational Veil: Positive Obligations of the European Union Following Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights

By Stubberfield, Catherine | Australian International Law Journal, Annual 2012 | Go to article overview

Lifting the Organisational Veil: Positive Obligations of the European Union Following Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights


Stubberfield, Catherine, Australian International Law Journal


Abstract

This article examines the likely positive obligations of the European Union ('EU') following its approaching accession to the European Convention on Human Rights. By focusing on the Dublin Regulation and recent asylum seeker returns to Greece as breaches of the prohibition on inhuman and degrading treatment, the article demonstrates that in dysfunctional areas of EU regulation, quite concrete changes will be necessary in order to meet the standards required thus far by the approach of the European Court of Human Rights and general principles of international law. This seems all the more probable given the prescriptive nature of the relationship between the EU and member states in the area of immigration. Ultimately, the article argues that current EU law fails to meet the requisite human rights obligations to protect and prevent, investigate, deter and prosecute. In the absence of reforms including a proposed suspension of transfers mechanism, the article concludes that the EU is likely to be condemned by the European Court of Human Rights for failing to meet its obligations under art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

I Introduction

The potential for stales to hide behind the 'organisational veil' of international institutions has become ever more significant, with increasing international mandates, scope and influence. Lifting the veil, however, goes beyond implications for member states and raises issues of responsibility for the organisation itself. Though still in their relative infancy, 'budding doctrine[s]' (1) on the responsibility of organisations are emerging to fill existing gaps in international law. Against this background, the obligations of the EU (having acquired independent legal personality) present a new and unique opportunity for human rights protection in Europe.

The Treaty of Lisbon, (2) renders the Charter of Fundamental Rights (3) legally binding and stipulates that the EU shall accede to the European Convention on Human Rights ('ECHR'). (4) The development marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of the regional legal system, lifting the veil that has thus far deflected any Strasbourg scrutiny of acts of the EU itself. Although not expanding the competences of the EU in any way, the change is expected to offer individuals greater legal certainty arid increased uniformity in the implementation of EU law. In increasing the effectiveness of rights now enshrined by the Charier of Fundamental Rights, ECHR and general Principles, such an approach should lead to stronger human rights protection within the European system.

Given the existing partial reliance by the European Court of Justice ('ECJ') upon the ECHR, and the EU's commitment to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, there has been some scepticism about the practical impact of EU accession to the ECHR. This article argues, however, that, in what the author ventures to call 'dysfunctional' areas of EU regulation, concrete policy improvements will be required. In support of this view, the article focuses on recent asylum conditions in Greece as inhuman and degrading treatment, and the return of asylum seekers to such conditions by other member states. (under current EU Law) as violations of art 3 of the ECHR. While the recent case of NS and ME (5) has now settled conclusively that EU law neither requires nor permits return of asylum seekers to Greece, the article questions whether or not the current state of EU law adequately fulfils the positive obligations to protect and prevent, investigate violations, and deter and prosecute.

The impact of the ECHR on member states returning asylum seekers to countries such as Greece has already attracted significant research and this article does not rehash the question of member state responsibility. There has been ongoing debate concerning asylum conditions in Greece as a violation of art 3, with the landmark Grand Chamber decision of MSS v Belgium and Greece (6) handed down in January 2011 concluding that Dublin returns to such conditions amount to a breach not only by Greece, but also by the relevant returning state.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Lifting the Organisational Veil: Positive Obligations of the European Union Following Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.