Distinguishing between the Capital Tax View and the Benefit View of the Property Tax at the Local Level

By Evans, Russell R.; Gade, Mary N. | Journal of Business Strategies, Spring 2013 | Go to article overview

Distinguishing between the Capital Tax View and the Benefit View of the Property Tax at the Local Level


Evans, Russell R., Gade, Mary N., Journal of Business Strategies


Abstract

The Great Recession of 2008 exposed municipalities across the U.S. to the dangers of over-reliance on a volatile sales tax base for general revenue financing. A 2010 interim study convened by the Oklahoma Legislature examined the possibility of offering access to the property tax base as a source of municipal general revenue. The feasibility of such a move depends crucially on understanding the economic incidence of the local property tax. Current research is divided on the issue, with one school proposing the property tax as a tax on capital generally (the capital tax view) and the other asserting the property tax as a user-fee for locally provided public services (the benefit view). We examine the incidence of the local property tax in Oklahoma County recognizing explicitly that the tax levy is really an aggregate of independent levies--each tied to the provision of a specific subset of local services --and that incidence outcome may vary by jurisdiction. An analysis of the 19 independent school districts in Oklahoma County over a 10-year period finds evidence that the incidence of the property tax varies both by levy and jurisdiction.

Introduction

Property taxes persist as a staple of local government finance. Wallis (2001) notes that while the role of the property tax at the national and state level has diminished over time, it continues to be the most important source of local government revenue. In fiscal year 2007, local governments in the U.S collected $518.6 billion with just over 71%, or $370.4 billion collected via local property taxes. (1) In the same period, local governments in Oklahoma collected $3.6 billion, with property taxes accounting for roughly 52%, or $1.9 billion of total collections. In Oklahoma, county governments rely heavily on the property tax as a source of local revenue while municipalities rely instead on a general sales tax; school districts employ the property tax exclusively as a source of local funding. A 2010 Oklahoma legislative task force was convened to examine the feasibility of allowing municipalities access to the local property tax base as a source of general revenue funds. Interest in the property tax as a source of general revenue funding underscores the importance of understanding the incidence and efficiency implications of the local property tax. The unfortunate reality of an absent consensus is discussed subsequently.

Almost as widespread as the reliance on the property tax as a local revenue source is the dislike for and confusion surrounding the levy. O'Sullivan, Sexton, and Sheffrin (1995) document the fascinating passage of California's proposition 13 and the subsequent spread of property tax reform. In fact, while Wallis (2001) posits that the reliance of local governments on the property tax likely reflects the "ability to more closely match the beneficiaries of government investments, policies, and programs with the taxpayers who foot the bill," economic development packages often center on local property tax abatement programs (Dalehite, Mikesell, & Zorn, 2005). Accompanying (and perhaps contributing to) a widespread distaste for the property tax, is a lack of agreement of its economic incidence. (2)

Alternative Views of Property Tax Incidence

The traditional view approaches the property tax as an excise tax levied on land and capital improvements. Generally considered in a partial equilibrium, single jurisdiction framework, the traditional view concludes that a jurisdiction's perfectly inelastic supply of land cannot escape its portion of the tax. The levy on land is borne by landowners and to the extent that land ownership increases with income, the property tax on land will be progressive. The excise tax on capital improvements begins with the assumption of perfectly elastic capital (between industries within a jurisdiction) and concludes that capital avoids the tax generally, leaving the burden with occupants (tenants) of the improvements.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Distinguishing between the Capital Tax View and the Benefit View of the Property Tax at the Local Level
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.