The Truth Behind Britain's Mau Mau Payout

By Kabukuru, Wanjohi | New African, July 2013 | Go to article overview

The Truth Behind Britain's Mau Mau Payout

Kabukuru, Wanjohi, New African

The historic admission by the British government on 6 June that it committed unimaginable atrocities in Kenya was unexpected. Indeed, the Mau Mau freedom heroes legal humiliation of the British government has been a 63-year journey that only kicked off 10 years ago. After decades of denial amid mounting pressure and accumulation of evidence, Her Majesty's Service (HMS) finally caved in and is to make a [pounds sterling]19.9m payout in compensation. But why are the British admitting to the horrors they commited now? Our Kenya correspondent, Wanjohi Kabukuru, explores the reasoning behind the sudden change of heart.

UNWILLING TO GO THE FULL distance, Her Majesty's Government in Britain took an unprecedented move by settling out of court a case that was filed in 2009 by five Mau Mau veterans (aged between 70 and 80 years--sadly one of the five has passed on in the interim) seeking compensation for the Emergency period in Kenya between 1952 to 1963.

Yes, following years of denial, the British government has officially acknowledged that extreme horrors, untold suffering and sheer bloodshed amidst social upheavals were part of what characterised Kenya's long walk to freedom.

"Emergency regulations were introduced: political organisations were banned; prohibited areas were created and provisions for detention without trial were enacted. The colonial authorities made unprecedented use of capital punishment and sanctioned harsh prison so-called 'rehabilitation' regimes," Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague told the House of Commons. "Many of those detained were never tried and the links of many with the Mau Mau were never proven. There was recognition at the time of the brutality of these repressive measures and the shocking level of violence, including an important debate in this House on the infamous events at Hola Camp in 1959" [extensively reported in New African, December 2003, in "Kenya: The Hola Massacre"].




Hague's admission was the first ever in six decades. Successive British governments denied any abuses in the Kenya colony, especially after Colonial Governor Sir Evelyn Baring declared a "State of Emergency" in October 1952. "I would like to make clear now and for the first time, on behalf of Her Majesty's Government, that we understand the pain and grievance felt by those who were involved in the events of the Emergency in Kenya. The British Government recognises that Kenyans were subject to torture and other forms of ill-treatment at the hands of colonial administration," Hague told the UK parliament.

"The British Government sincerely regrets that these abuses took place and they marred Kenya's progress towards independence. Torture and ill-treatment are abhorrent violations of human dignity which we unreservedly condemn."

Hague admitted that this reprehensible period in Kenya's history that was ignored by independence governments stood in the way of reconciliation for the two nations. The decades-old denial of this episode in Kenyan history is not only a shame on the British government but also on previous Kenyan administrations. The post-independence governments did not make room for the recognition of the freedom heroes and neither did they fully address the concerns of a just society, as was enshrined by the Mau Mau freedom struggle.

Indeed, numerous unrelenting efforts have been made to hush up and distort the Mau Mau episode. Officialdom, with the assistance of Kenyan academia, has fiercely sought to play down and deny the pivotal role of the Mau Mau in Kenya's independence struggle. The underlying reason for this prevailing state of affairs is attributed to the premise of fear by the British, Jomo Kenyatta and Daniel arap Moi governments, who never officially recognised the Mau Mau, let alone accepted their quest for justice. It is a known historical fact that Mzee Kenyatta, Kenya's founding father, hushed up the Mau Mau issue in a bid to heal a nation that had been badly affected by the bloody era. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

The Truth Behind Britain's Mau Mau Payout


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.