The Soft Law Alternative to the Who's Treaty Powers

By Klock, Kevin A. | Georgetown Journal of International Law, Winter 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Soft Law Alternative to the Who's Treaty Powers

Klock, Kevin A., Georgetown Journal of International Law

TABLE OF CONTENTS    I. INTRODUCTION  II. THE WHO'S EXPERIENCE WITH HARD INTERNATIONAL HEALTH      LAW      A. Hard Law: Uses and Drawbacks      B. The WHO's Article 19 Power and Experience      C. The WHO's Article 21 Power and Experience      D. Summary III. THE SOFT LAW ALTERNATIVE: ATTRIBUTES AND PROSPECTS      A. Sovereignty Costs and Normative Experimentation      B. Coordination and Central Coordinator      C. Participation of Non-State Actors      D. Nimble and Responsive to Rapid Scientific Change      E. Customary International Law      F. Summary  IV. APPLICATION OF SOFT LAW TO THE WHO AND INTERNATIONAL      HEALTH LAW      A. Lowering Sovereignty Costs and Establishing Health Norms      B. Global Health Coordination and the WHO as Coordinator      C. Participation of Non-State Actors      D. Nimble and Responsive Health Agreements      E. Customary International Health Law      F. Summary   V. A FOURTH AGREEMENT: WILL HISTORY REPEAT?  VI. CONCLUSION 


In 1947, the world "recognized that the solution of certain problems in the field of health depends on international action" (1) and needed a "powerful and competent international body [to] apply[] modern remedies ...." (2) In this spirit, the Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO) bestowed on its highest decision-making body, the World Health Assembly (WHA), (3) the power to adopt binding international agreements. (4) However, it has used this power only three times. (5) Some commentators label this inaction "myopia," (6) argue it damages the WHO's institutional legitimacy, (7) and advocate greater use. (8) Perhaps in response to this criticism, in May 2012, the WHA unanimously resolved to begin work on a fourth agreement. (9)

However, "soft law" agreements are also used to coordinate and organize international activity. (10) This Note argues that instead of energizing its mostly dormant treaty-making authority, the WHO can better facilitate the development of global health 'law' by promulgating soft law instruments containing specific, concrete provisions. Practitioners in international financial and environmental law have deployed such instruments effectively to decrease the barriers to entry, articulate norms, facilitate coordination, involve non-state actors, and respond to rapid change. (11)

Section II of this Note analyzes the WHO's experience with its constitutional treaty-making power, revealing significant drawbacks to hard lawmaking. Section III defines soft law, reviews its relative benefits, and explains why it works with international financial and environmental agreements. Section IV analyzes the characteristics of sort law in light of the goals of global health law, (12) concluding that it provides an effective basis for coordinating international health efforts and potentially creates binding customary law. Section V will critique the recent WHA decision to pursue another binding agreement and explain why the choice of instrument may hinder, rather than foster, its noble aims.


The mission of the WHO is "to act as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work." (13) Much global health research concerns the WHO's activity. (14) Due to its position, some commentators have lamented the "untapped" potential of the WHO's role in crafting global health law, (15) defined as:

   [A] field that encompasses the legal norms, processes, and    institutions needed to create the conditions for people throughout    the world to attain the highest possible level of physical and    mental health. The field seeks to facilitate health-promoting    behavior among the key actors that significantly influence the    public's health, including international organizations,    governments, businesses, foundations, the media, and civil society.    The mechanisms of global health law should stimulate investment in    research and development, mobilize resources, set priorities,    coordinate activities, monitor progress, create incentives, and    enforce standards. 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Soft Law Alternative to the Who's Treaty Powers


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?