The Bitter Legal Battle for Household: Directors' Anti-Takeover Give Rise to Exchange of Lawsuits

By Sudo, Philip T. | American Banker, September 4, 1984 | Go to article overview

The Bitter Legal Battle for Household: Directors' Anti-Takeover Give Rise to Exchange of Lawsuits


Sudo, Philip T., American Banker


NEW YORK -- Household International Inc. is embroiled in a family feud.

The Prospect Heights, Ill.-based firm said last week it is filing suit against John Moran, a director and member of Household's executive committee and chief executive officer of the Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corp. (DKM), a private New York investment company and Household's largest shareholder.

The suit is a response to litigation filed earlier this month by Mr. Moran and DKM against Household International, the parent company for Household Finance Corp., National Car Rental, and other merchandising and manufacturing subsidiaries.

The dispute -- which may shape up as a battle for control -- stems from an anti-takeover plan authorized by Household International's board of directors on Aug. 14. Mr. Moran claims the plan will adversely affect the value of the stock. DKM holds the equivalent of 6.9% of Household common stock, acquired for about $13 million.

The Household board may have been worried about a takeover after watching a hostile takeover battle between two other consumer finance companies. Last month, Avco Financial Services Inc. of Newport Beach, Calif., fended off a hostile takeover bid by New York-based Leucadia National Corp. The fight was settled last week when Leucadia sold its 2.6 million

Avco shares back to the company for $100 million.

Household itself, with assets of $9.1 billion, is an attractive takeover candidate. Its primary holding is Household Finance, which has more than 1,000 consumer finance offices in 45 states and offices in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Last week, Household Finance acquired two troubled thrifts, Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Association in Baltimore and American Heritage Savings in Bloomingdale, Ill. The firm also holds two other thrifts, as well as a tax service and an insurance company.

The holding company's other subsidiaries include: Household Merchandising Inc., with annual sales of more than $5.3 billion; Household Manufacturing Inc., with annual sales of more than $750 million; and National Car Rental System Inc. and Wien Air Alaska Inc. airlines. Poison Pill

The controversial plan represents the latest in what is known as the "poison pill" type of anti-takeover measure -- a rule that permits friendly offers, but protects the company from a hostile one while trying to maximize stockholder gain.

Issued last Tuesday, the "Preferred Share Purchase Rights Plan" gives all shareholders a special right that cannot be separated from the stock. The right can be invoked only after a corporate predator appears, either by acquiring 20% of the common stock or by making an offer for 30%. It allows shareholders to buy, for $100, a security with the same dividend as Household common stock. If a hostile takeover ensues, the $100 security could be exchanged for $200 worth of the new owner's common stock.

The aim is to avoid the so-called "two-tier bust-up" tender offers that have become prevalent in today's merger-crazed environment. In such an offer, the first tier involves a cash purchase of stock at a price significantly higher than its book value; after control is gained, the second tier involves converting shares of those who did not sell for cash into the purchaser's stock. "Bust-up" refers to the practice of a buyer stripping the acquired company of its assets to pay back loans used for the purchase.

The Household poison pill plan would make the second tier stock conversion so costly that only a first tier all-cash offer for all the stock could succeed. Household has nearly 60 million shares outstanding, assuming conversion of all outstanding preferred stock, currently trading at about $32 per share. No Effect on Voting Rights

The catch is that if a friendly offer should be made, the board may cancel the special rights by paying 50 cents for each right per share. The plan has no effect on voting rights, as the purchase rights do not carry any right to vote. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Bitter Legal Battle for Household: Directors' Anti-Takeover Give Rise to Exchange of Lawsuits
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.