Protectionism, Barter Distort Global Trade Balance Picture

By Mendelsohn, M. S. | American Banker, September 21, 1984 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Protectionism, Barter Distort Global Trade Balance Picture


Mendelsohn, M. S., American Banker


In the past few years the focus of international concern has shifted increasingly onto trade, and for good reason. World trade has only just begun to recover this year from its most serious peace-time decline in more than half a century.

During the thirty years through 1980, world trade expanded almost consistently and for the most part appreciably faster than world output. But in the three years through 1983, world trade actually fell more sharply than total output. As a result, the role of trade as an "engine of growth" can no longer be assumed with the same confidence as before, least of all if protectionism goes on proliferating to make matters even worse.

On the International Monetary Fund's calculations, the value of world exports declined for three consecutive years through 1983 by a total of about 11.5%. That was a significantly lesser contraction than the 27% fall estimated to have taken place in world trade during the four years from 1929 to 1932, but still extremely worrying after a generation of almost unbroken trade expansion.

During the 30 years to 1980, the value of world trade fell only in two years, in 1952 and 1958, and the volume of world exports, which likewise declined during the three years through 1983, had similarly fallen only twice before in the preceding 30 years, in 1958 and 1975.

Small wonder, then, that this year's annual IMF report concentrates on trade -- along with fiscal policy -- as one of the two aspects of the global economy in most need of urgent official action. Yet the concern about "creeping protectionism," which has been a recurring topic for about the last ten years, has so far produced few actual results.

As the IMF report notes, somewhat acidly, in its concluding passage: "Several international meetings at the ministerial level have emphasized the determination of the participants to resist and roll back protectionist measures. It is to be hoped that the coming year will see more success in bringing these intentions to fruition than has been apparent hitherto."

Concern about world trade has reasons that go deeper than the shock of the three-year downturn from 1980 to 1983. During the 1970s, the volume of world exports had slowed down to an annual growth rate of 5.5% from 8% in the 1960s and 6.5% in the 1950s. This was mainly due to the very steep rise in world export prices, initially oil and other raw material prices, but prices of manufactured exports thereafter as well.

The value of world exports, which had risen by an annual average of 7% in the 1950s and 9.5% in the 1960s, rose by an average of almost 21% a year in the 1970s. This contributed at first to a distinct slowing down in the volume of world export growth and then to the three-year decline at the start of this decade both in value and volume. Price Stability Is Best Hope

It follows that the best hope for a resumption of a sustained growth in world trade both as an engine and product of world economic growth lies in the maintenance of the relative price stability achieved as a result of the three-year global disinflation from 1979 to 1982. Nevertheless, protectionism in itself imposes a high cost both on the countries that try to "protect" their jobs and industries, and on their trading partners, whose exports are curtailed.

A particularly visible danger posed by trade protectionsim is the threat that it poses for troubled debtor countries striving to return to full debt service and credit standing. The broadly defined developing countries, including oil exporters, account for about 30% of world trade, as measured by the value of world exports or imports.

Moreover, a large part of that is concentrated precisely in a number of the biggest debtor countries. Severe and simultaneous import contraction to which those countries have resorted as a first step towards returning to good credit standing would, if protracted, pose its own dangers to the major western trading countries.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Protectionism, Barter Distort Global Trade Balance Picture
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?