An Error in the National Pastime: Antitrust Exemption

By Lumpkin, Angela | Phi Kappa Phi Forum, Fall 2013 | Go to article overview

An Error in the National Pastime: Antitrust Exemption


Lumpkin, Angela, Phi Kappa Phi Forum


Major League Baseball, about to begin its postseason, continues to benefit from repeated funny business by the United States Supreme Court. In one of the most inexplicable decisions ever handed down, Associate Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the 1922 opinion in Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs et al. that organized baseball was a sport characterized by the personal effort of players, but was not a business, with transportation of the athletes across state lines incidental to the exhibitions. This unfortunate, although unanimous, ruling has never been overturned in subsequent cases.

The Baltimore Terrapins of the defunct Federal League (founded as a minor league in 1913 and functioning as a rival major league in 1914 and 1915) argued that MLB teams had conspired to create a monopoly, thus violating the 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act by restraining interstate trade and commerce. The plaintiff claimed the National League, established in 1876, and American League, founded in 1901, had cornered the market by buying out Federal League teams that had lured away talented players via higher salaries. Further, unlike these two older leagues, which became MLB and began competing in the World Series in 1903, the Federal League ignored MLB's reserve clause, which the National League had adopted after the 1879 season to bind a player initially signed with a team to one additional year with that team after the contract was up. No player could join another outfit unless his contract, with the attendant reserve clause, was sold or traded, or he was released. (Similar reserve clauses were subsequently incorporated into professional sport player contracts because of the financial advantages afforded owners to restrain salaries and prevent players jumping to another team.)

In Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. from 1953, the Supreme Court upheld Federal Baseball and ruled 7-2 against pitcher George Toolson. He claimed monopolistic behavior restricted him to a minor league team because the Yankees had no place for him on its active roster. Toolson asserted he was good enough to make it to the big show but the reserve clause prevented him from doing so. Nonetheless, "We think that if there are evils in this field which now warrant application to it of the antitrust laws," the unsigned decision read, "it should be by legislation," meaning Congress, not the Court.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

In Curt Flood v. Sow Kuhn in 1972, the Supreme Court again upheld the 1922 precedent with a 5-3 opinion written by Associate Justice Harry Blackmun. Although supported by the MLB Players Association, Flood couldn't sign with a team of the All-Star centerfielder's choice; he had been traded from the St. Louis Cardinals to the Philadelphia Phillies but refused to go, yet he couldn't negotiate with other teams. Waxing nostalgic on the game's origins and including a long list of marquee players, Blackmun took pains to call the reserve system "an exception and an anomaly" and Federal Baseball and Toolson an "aberration" to federal antitrust laws. He also declared, "Professional baseball is a business and it is engaged in interstate commerce. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Error in the National Pastime: Antitrust Exemption
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.