No Room for Discredited Economic Models in an Era of Jobless Growth

Cape Times (South Africa), August 21, 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

No Room for Discredited Economic Models in an Era of Jobless Growth


BYLINE: Glenn Ashton

Structural poverty, exacerbated by falling employment, has dogged South Africa since 1994. Subsequently unemployment has officially increased from about 20 percent of the active workforce to 25 percent today. The unofficial, "expanded", and probably more realistic, level of unemployment is closer to 40 percent. This issue, more than any other, threatens the fundamental stability of our nation.

In 1995, the philosopher Jeremy Rifkin published The End of Work. His predictions regarding unemployment were on the money. Technology and machines not only automated work, they simultaneously destroyed jobs at a staggering rate.

Industrial agriculture using GM crops employs fewer than two people per hectare. Free online advertising websites like Craigslist and Gumtree have destroyed classified adverts, shrinking income and employment in that industry by at least 80 percent. Real manufacturing has gone east, to China, India and the little tigers, never to return. Employment archetypes have been fundamentally transformed.

South Africa has been seriously compromised in its ability to deal with these challenges. Our self-imposed restructuring favoured big business and extractive industries. Eskom's relationship with Billiton is a case in point; we effectively subsidise this offshore multinational, paying three to five times more for our electricity.

Our government managed the remaining scraps fairly well but remains handicapped by its neo-liberal approach. It is not as if the economy has stagnated, here or abroad. Quite the opposite. Our GDP more than tripled, from about $135 billion in 1994 to more than $450bn today. Globally it more than doubled, from $33 trillion to more than $71 trillion. Global wealth is presently estimated at about $[euros] trillion.

So where did this wealth disappear to? It didn't trickle down, as promised, to where it was most needed. Instead, it ascended into the pockets of the already affluent. While South Africa has the most extreme inequality in the world, things elsewhere are little better; around a million people control nearly half of all planetary wealth. The richest 300 control as much wealth as the bottom 3 billion. In the US, the wealthiest 20 percent control 90 percent; in South Africa the top 10 percent control 80 percent. Inequality rules.

Only the elite benefit. That we lead the world in inequality, amid our plenty, should raise alarms. Frustration grows at the lack of visible change, evidenced by service delivery protests and crime. We obviously cannot employ people in an economy driven by jobless growth.

When Rifkin wrote The End of Work, he suggested increased unemployment through efficiency may create a more leisurely, egalitarian system. He was wrong. Jobless growth has driven unprecedented wealth concentration and greed. The plutocracy has sequestered up to one-third of the world's total estimated wealth in tax havens and other financial black holes.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

No Room for Discredited Economic Models in an Era of Jobless Growth
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?