Comparison of Patient Simulation Methods Used in a Physical Assessment Course

By Grice, Gloria R.; Wenger, Philip et al. | American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, May 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Comparison of Patient Simulation Methods Used in a Physical Assessment Course


Grice, Gloria R., Wenger, Philip, Brooks, Natalie, Berry, Tricia M., American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education


INTRODUCTION

In the 1980s, approximately 33% of clinical pharmacist faculty members and 20% of clinical pharmacist adjunct faculty members reported performing physical assessment in patient monitoring. (1) Since then, the role of pharmacists in direct patient care has expanded and clinical pharmacists are now routinely using a variety of patient assessment techniques to ensure optimal medication therapy outcomes. (2) Colleges and schools of pharmacy must look beyond current practice and envision the expectations and duties of the pharmacist of the future and prepare students to become pharmacists capable of managing medication therapy. The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) requires that physical assessment be taught in the classroom (patient assessment laboratory) and experiential settings. (3) While the need to teach physical assessment has been established, the method for how to teach it has not.

In 2007, Spray and colleagues distributed a 20-item questionnaire to US pharmacy practice department chairs to determine the content, extent, and design of physical assessment training/teaching in the pharmacy curriculum (the TOPAS study). (4) Ninety-six percent of the programs that responded indicated patient assessment skills were taught, mostly for the advancement of the profession of pharmacy and because it was required to meet ACPE standards. The most common topics covered were pulmonary examination, cardiovascular examination, and assessment of vital signs; these results were consistent with previous findings. (4,5) The majority (76%) of colleges and schools used the laboratory setting for instruction; 27% of those in a "simulated clinical setting" and 63% didactically. Their methods did not clearly define the parameters of the simulated clinical setting or whether manikins or standardized patients were used.

Using standardized patients to teach physical assessment has a 95% success rate in students successfully demonstrating the ability to perform the skills. (6) Using standardized patients can provide a more realistic setting and can be potentially less embarrassing than using peers or faculty members to practice physical assessment. (6,7) In general, student pharmacists prefer to practice physical assessment techniques on the following (in decreasing order of preference): standardized patients, peers, instructors, and staff members. (7) In addition to using standardized patients, having a medical facilitator explain and demonstrate the skills and respond to student questions while the students are practicing the skills on the standardized patient is important. (6) Many programs use trained standardized patients for evaluation purposes as well, or at a minimum, patients who are able to provide feedback directly to the student.

While manikins do not offer the same benefits as standardized patients, they are highly effective in training student pharmacists. (8) Seybert and colleagues demonstrated that the majority of student pharmacists participating in a critical care simulation that used manikins (programmed in advance) were extremely satisfied with the experience (88%). Some specific benefits of this approach included that the facilitator could control the learning environment, adapt the simulation to the students' performance level, and conduct debriefing with the students immediately following the session.

Student pharmacists overall find learning physical assessment to be valuable (especially when taught by medical faculty members vs pharmacy faculty members), despite not feeling confident in performing these techniques. (9,10) Given the increasing importance of pharmacists having this skill and that it is an ACPE requirement, determining the best technique for teaching physical assessment is important for colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Student pharmacists at St. Louis College of Pharmacy were required to take a 1-credit course focused on learning basic physical assessment and patient interviewing skills.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Comparison of Patient Simulation Methods Used in a Physical Assessment Course
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?