Quantitative Analysis of Students' Reasons for Nonsuiting and Support of Policy Change at One Urban Middle School

By Kahan, David; Graham, Kathy | Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, December 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Quantitative Analysis of Students' Reasons for Nonsuiting and Support of Policy Change at One Urban Middle School

Kahan, David, Graham, Kathy, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Purpose: Physical activity participation in physical education is compromised when students nonsuit. We investigated: (a) reasons for nonsuiting/support of policy change and whether they differed by gender, ethnicity, or grade; and (b) the likelihood of nonsuiting based on the same demographics. Method: Participants (N = 627) were 6th and 7th graders attending 1 urban middle school located in San Diego, CA. Students completed a questionnaire composed of 4 demographic items, level of agreement with 15 reasons for nonsuiting, and level of support of 6 proposed policy changes. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to classify reasons for nonsuiting items and policy change items. Demographic differences among resultant factor scores and individual items were analyzed using t tests. Associations between factors/items and nonsuit frequency and demographics were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Results: Girls, Latinos, and 7th graders were more likely habitual nonsuits ([greater than or less than] 4 nonsuits) compared with their respective counterparts. Statistically significant factor scores (reasons for nonsuiting; emotional excuses, utilitarian excuses) were higher among habitual nonsuits but were not different based on gender, grade, and ethnicity. Seventh graders and girls had statistically significantly higher policy change factor scores compared with their respective counterparts. Conclusion: Acting on student input toward reformulating suiting-out policy as well as addressing emotional excuse reasons, which are primarily under teacher control, may result in lower incidence of habitual nonsuiting.

Keywords: factor analysis, physical education, secondary education, uniform


Distrust any enterprise that requires new clothes.

(Henry David Thoreau, 1854, para. 36)

A mere 12 years after Thoreau authored this quote, California became the first state to mandate school physical education (PE). It is imaginable that students of that time obeyed suiting-out rules while withholding objections to this enduring class routine. Formal research on suiting out has been generally descriptive in nature and takes one of two forms: (a) questionnaires in which feelings about suiting out for PE are quantified and ranked against other class characteristics, and (b) in-depth qualitative inquiry whereby teachers and students are observed and questioned regarding suiting-out policies and routines.

Strand and Scantling (1994) found that 80% of nearly 1,000 secondary students believed that proper athletic wear should be required for PE; however, they listed it among a distinct second tier of attributes that students thought should be used among grading criteria. Among 500 teens, suiting out for class was the third (7%) most prevalent thing they disliked about PE (National Association for Sport and Physical Education, 2000). A similar pattern was observed among more than 600 middle school students, whose dislike of suiting out for PE ranked second among eight choices (Ryan, Fleming, & Maina, 2003).

Qualitative accounts of suiting-out phenomena rarely stand alone in the literature. Instead they are more likely part of broader studies of class ecologies and rules, routines, and expectations (RRE). O'Sullivan and Dyson (1994) examined the RRE of 11 high school teachers in urban and suburban school districts. Teachers were observed at the start of the school year spending up to 4 days addressing policies and procedures associated with suiting out (~100 of 275 RRE initiated and rehearsed). Nonsuiting thresholds associated with escalating negative consequences varied across teachers as did the consequences themselves: within a specific lesson (e.g., sitting, assisting with equipment or scoring, writing reports, running) and outside of it (e.g., detention, parental notification, course failure). At one middle school, teachers taught and enforced an elaborate suiting-out routine with no espoused reason other than it being the way things were always done (Oslin, 1994).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Quantitative Analysis of Students' Reasons for Nonsuiting and Support of Policy Change at One Urban Middle School


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?