Is Data Speech?

By Bambauer, Jane | Stanford Law Review, January 2014 | Go to article overview

Is Data Speech?


Bambauer, Jane, Stanford Law Review


INTRODUCTION  I. WHAT Is "DATA," AND WHAT IS "SPEECH"?     A. Data     B. Speech  II. DATA IN FIRST AMENDMENT PRECEDENT     A. Existing Data        1. Gleanings from privacy law        2. Gleanings from commercial speech regulations        3. Gleanings from copyright law     B. Data Creation as Nonexpressive Conduct     C. Data Creation as Expressive Conduct  III. THE RIGHT TO CREATE KNOWLEDGE     A. The Negative Right to Create Knowledge     B. Data and First Amendment Objectives        1. Marketplace of ideas and public good theories        2. Deliberative democracy and a check on state power        3. Self-Determination     C. The Level of Scrutiny  IV. COPING WITH SCRUTINY     A. Concern 1: Scrutiny Will Kill Privacy and Other Good Things     B. Concern 2: If Data Is Speech, Regulators Are Hamstrung     C. Concern 3: Scrutiny Is Subjective at Best, Political at Worst  CONCLUSION 

[I]f there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought....

--Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (1)

INTRODUCTION

When does factual information become speech? The appealing, simple answers reside at the extremes.

Perhaps information is always speech. After all, information communicates, educates, and persuades. A single plain fact can do more to change minds and alter debates than a thousand opinions. But this rule goes too far. There are many times that an event will leave a mark that has the potential to retell its story. A car may careen into a barrier and leave a streak of paint. Long after the car is towed, the streak states, in a way, when and where the crash occurred, how fast the car was traveling during impact, and what color the car was. The streak of paint can be received and interpreted by a human to create knowledge. (2) But if a city repainted the barrier, we would not interpret this as a decision related to speech. Likewise a crack in the sidewalk might tell the story of a frost, but a municipal ordinance requiring property owners to maintain their sidewalks would not be an act of censorship. Every cell contains DNA, the body's ultimate archive of information, and yet the proper disposal of used syringes does not, and should not, implicate First Amendment scrutiny.

Since data is expressed in alphanumeric symbols, it certainly looks a lot more like traditional speech than a crack in the sidewalk. (3) However, conceptually it is sometimes not so far off. When data is the byproduct of other events and services--transactions between a home computer and a website's server, or between a cell phone and a cell tower--these records are no different from other unanticipated marks created by the bustle of life. They have no intended author, and no intended audience. They are mere footprints.

If information isn't always speech, then perhaps it is never speech. After all, the quintessential First Amendment litigant expresses some unpopular idea or opinion. Maybe the domain of the First Amendment is opinion, and other products of human subjectivity. This rule runs into unsalvageable problems even more quickly than the last. Some of the most important modern speech cases concerned the unadorned reporting of raw information. The Supreme Court protected the New York Times's distribution of the Pentagon Papers from prior restraint by the federal government on the basis of its First Amendment rights to do so. (4) The New York Times had received a leak of the Pentagon Papers--a report created by the Department of Defense to document the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. Many details in the report conflicted with the information that the Johnson Administration had told the public, so the Pentagon Papers were significant not only for the details within them, but also for the inevitable inference that President Johnson had deceived Americans. Justices Black and Douglas had no trouble recognizing the speech interests in raw facts--the fact of the Pentagon Papers' existence and the facts that were reported in them. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is Data Speech?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.