Fourth Amendment - Warrantless Searches - Fifth Circuit Upholds Stored Communications Act's Non-Warrant Requirement for Cell-Site Data as Not per Se Unconstitutional

Harvard Law Review, February 2014 | Go to article overview

Fourth Amendment - Warrantless Searches - Fifth Circuit Upholds Stored Communications Act's Non-Warrant Requirement for Cell-Site Data as Not per Se Unconstitutional


FOURTH AMENDMENT--WARRANTLESS SEARCHES--FIFTH CIRCUIT UP HOLDS STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT'S NON-WARRANT REQUIREMENT FOR CELL-SITE DATA AS NOT PER SE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.--In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, 724 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2013).

The Fourth Amendment is traditionally understood to balance privacy and security. (1) But changes in technology (2) and the goals and methods of police work (3) have threatened to unsettle the meaning of the Fourth Amendment's protections. (4) The constitutional status of cell phones and the data they contain and produce is particularly contested. (5) Recently, in In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, (6) the Fifth Circuit added an important new voice to this debate, holding that the Stored Communications Act (7) (SCA) provision allowing the government to demand cell-site location data (8) from service providers did not authorize a "search," and therefore that its lack of a warrant requirement was not per se unconstitutional. In reaching its holding, the Fifth Circuit assumed that its positive analysis--that cell phone users do not in fact expect their cell-site location data to be private--was dispositive of whether the Fourth Amendment's probable cause requirement ought to apply. It unwisely declined to apply a normative analysis asking whether location data should be protected by the Fourth Amendment. Both a recent Supreme Court case and relevant legislation could have signaled to the court that location data may warrant Fourth Amendment protections. Courts that review similar questions--including the Supreme Court (9)--should consider asking not only whether cell phone users do in fact expect privacy in their location data, but also whether they should.

In 2010, the United States submitted applications in three criminal investigations to Magistrate Judge Smith of the Southern District of Texas seeking to compel records from cell phone service providers. (10) The government requested historical cell-site location data for a two-month period detailing the location of certain cell phones to varying degrees of precision. (11) The United States' applications were filed under the SCA, which establishes that a court shall issue an order compelling disclosure of communications records if the government provides "specific and articulable facts" showing a reasonable belief that the records are relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation. (12)

Magistrate Judge Smith denied the United States' applications, finding that warrantless disclosure of cell-site data violates the Fourth Amendment based on three independent doctrines. (13) First, he held that "refinements in location-based technology" that allowed the government to trace suspects into their own homes could invade the privacy of the home in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (14) Second, he held that historical cell-site data was protected under the "prolonged surveillance doctrine" set forth by the D.C. Circuit in United States v. Maynard, (15) as that data can paint an "intimate picture" of a suspect's personal life. (16) Finally, he rejected the government's argument that the Fourth Amendment was inapplicable because cell phone users had disclosed voluntarily the data in question to service providers. Magistrate Judge Smith held that location information had not been "voluntarily conveyed" by the phone user to the service provider. (17) Judge Hughes issued a brief order upholding the Magistrate Judge's opinion. (18)

The Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded with instructions to grant the government's applications. (19) In an opinion by Judge Clement, (20) the court held that orders authorizing subpoenas for historical cell-site data under the SCA are not per se unconstitutional. (21) The court first considered whether it could avoid the constitutional issue. (22) The ACLU, an amicus curiae, had argued that the SCA could be read to afford a magistrate judge discretion to require that the government obtain a warrant, even where the government had met the "specific and articulable facts" standard under 18 U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fourth Amendment - Warrantless Searches - Fifth Circuit Upholds Stored Communications Act's Non-Warrant Requirement for Cell-Site Data as Not per Se Unconstitutional
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.