Reflections on the Present State of Economics

By Steindl, Josef | Monthly Review, February 1985 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Reflections on the Present State of Economics


Steindl, Josef, Monthly Review


In my lifetime I witnessed two major changes in outlook in economics: first the Keynesian revolution, and then the counterrevolution, the return of the Bourbons.

I was raised in the traditions of the Austrian School which represented an attempt to transplant British liberalism in general and Manchester liberalism in particular in space and time to an industrial late comer. The transplant did not take too well, and after the First World War the school became anachronistic. Ludwig von Mises, then its chief representative, as secretary of the Chamber of Trade resided in the middle of a building dedicated mainly to the administration of quotas, clearing agreements, tariffs, etc. He was a splendid pamphleteer and speaker. In his view economics consisted of tautologies. This did not worry him, however, it only made it irrefutable. Ironically enough, he founded the Osterreichisches Institut fur Konjunkturforschung which was devoted mainly to empirical research. It was the focus of a circle of Austrian economists (Hayek and Morgenstern as successive directors, Haberler, Machlup, Strigl, Tintner as collaborators) and a stream of visitors from abroad. Owing to its skillful set-up (everybody who counted in economic life was represented on the board) it became, as reconstituted after the war (under the name Osterreichisches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung), a rather important institution in Austrian economics.

My teacher was Richard Strigl, a kind man and good teacher who taught me everything I soon came to disbelieve. He taught me, however, what economics is about, which is perhaps more than some students are learning today.

My existence as an economist is based not on one but on three strokes of luck: I got a job at the above-mentioned institute after graduation in 1935. After losing this job as a consequence of the Nazi takeover in 1938 I obtained a grant as a research lecturer at Balliol College, Oxford, which enabled me to emigrate to England where I passed my formative years. And I worked next to Michal Kalecki at the Oxford Institute of Statistics from 1940 to 1944. Without these rather improbable events I would have been a washout. This probably contributed to my later interest in random processes.

I should mention here that the leading members of the Austrian School, Mises, Haberler, Hayek and others, operating from abroad, showed great solidarity in organizing jobs in other countries for those economists whose career in Austria had been terminated by the political upheaval of 1938. This was a necessary condition also for my emigration. The sufficient condition was provided, in my case, by the openmindedness of the Master and Fellows of Balliol College, in the more general case, of British scholars and universities who assisted refugees at a time when such action was not exactly popular, and when young British academics did not always find it easy to get a job.

My acquaintance with the work of Keynes was mediated by Gerhard Tintner, who organized a seminar in the Konjunkturinstitut to discuss the General Theory as soon as it was published. The resulting process of reorientation was painful, slow, and difficult, for me as for most economists. It seemed to be another instance of the change of paradigm as described by Thomas Kuhn, which takes place from time to time in science.

What distinguished Kuhn from Popper and what shocked his readers was simply that he described scientific evolution as a social and historical process, which looks irrational from the point of view of a naive concept of scientific evolution as a process of selection of the fittest theory, i.e., that which can best survive falsification attempts. This naive concept of the development of science has a close parallel in the concept of pure economics, a rational scheme devoid of any social and historical elements. Such ideas seem to rest on a primitive misunderstanding: if you insist that the object of your analysis (the economy, the development of science) is rational.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Reflections on the Present State of Economics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?