Court Tosses out Caps in Wrongful Death Cases; Justices Rule 2003 Law Limiting Damages in Medical Malpractice Suits Unfair for Large Families

By Pantazi, Andrew | The Florida Times Union, March 14, 2014 | Go to article overview

Court Tosses out Caps in Wrongful Death Cases; Justices Rule 2003 Law Limiting Damages in Medical Malpractice Suits Unfair for Large Families


Pantazi, Andrew, The Florida Times Union


Byline: Andrew Pantazi

Families of people who died from medical malpractice are entitled to as much money as juries decide, the Florida Supreme Court ruled 5-2 on Thursday, overriding a contentious 11-year-old law.

The decision didn't surprise attorneys.

The law limited how much the victims' families could be awarded in a medical malpractice lawsuit. The decision specifically addressed people who died from medical malpractice and did not address personal-injury cases.

The decision overturned a 2003 law promoted by insurers, doctors and former Gov. Jeb Bush who argued large jury awards prompted doctors to flee the state and sent medical malpractice insurance skyrocketing. Victims, the law said, could only collect a certain amount of money in medical malpractice cases.

The law allowed tangible, calculable damages - like income loss - to go uncapped. But intangible damages - like mental anguish, pain, the cost of losing a mother to guide you through life - would be capped based on the case.

For example, if a hospital was at fault in the death of a mother, the most the patient's family could collect was $1 million spread among all her family members.

The Supreme Court justices decided that was biased against victims with large families.

The Supreme Court case decision dealt with the 2006 death of Michelle McCall.

In February 2006, McCall, 20, was pregnant. Her blood pressure spiked, and she suffered complications. She delivered a son, but the Air Force family doctors couldn't remove the placenta. Her blood pressure dropped, and family members told the doctors they were concerned she was losing too much blood. An obstetrician then removed the placenta. The Air Force family practitioners told him McCall hadn't lost much blood, and the anesthesiologist said her vital signs were OK. The obstetrician ordered a blood transfusion if needed. About an hour and a half later, a nurse attempted to draw blood and noticed McCall was in shock. She never woke. She left behind a son and two parents.

The district court ruled her family deserved $2 million, but it couldn't give more than $1 million split three ways because of the state law.

That, the Supreme Court found, was unfair. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Court Tosses out Caps in Wrongful Death Cases; Justices Rule 2003 Law Limiting Damages in Medical Malpractice Suits Unfair for Large Families
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.