Employment Law - Free Speech Rights - Ninth Circuit Finds Garcetti Official Duty Rule Inapplicable to Professorial Speech in Public University Context

Harvard Law Review, April 2014 | Go to article overview

Employment Law - Free Speech Rights - Ninth Circuit Finds Garcetti Official Duty Rule Inapplicable to Professorial Speech in Public University Context


EMPLOYMENT LAW--FREE SPEECH RIGHTS--NINTH CIRCUIT FINDS GARCETTI OFFICIAL DUTY RULE INAPPLICABLE TO PROFESSORIAL SPEECH IN PUBLIC-UNIVERSITY CONTEXT. --Demers v. Austin, No. 11-35558, 2014 WL 306321 (9th Cir. Jan. 29, 2014)

In 2006, the Supreme Court held in Garcetti v. Ceballos (1) that public employees speaking "pursuant to their official duties" do not receive First Amendment protection from employer discipline. (2) Commentators have widely viewed Garcetti's "official duty" rule as severely constraining the First Amendment rights of public employees to speak freely in the workplace. (3) But the Garcetti Court explicitly left unanswered the question of Garcetti's applicability in the university context. (4) Recently, in Demers v. Austin, (5) the Ninth Circuit ruled that Garcetti does not apply to professorial "speech related to scholarship or teaching" (6) because extending the "official duty" rule to the university context would be inconsistent with First Amendment protections for academic freedom. (7) While the panel's reasoning may have merit as applied to classroom teaching and academic scholarship, the Ninth Circuit overzealously extended constitutional protection to internal administrative speech in conflict with both the employment law emphasis on the context of employee speech and the Supreme Court's deferential approach toward institutional academic freedom.

Plaintiff David Demers was a tenured associate professor at Washington State University (WSU) with the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication (Murrow School). (8) In early 2007, while serving on the Murrow School's Structure Committee, (9) Demers distributed a two-page pamphlet entitled "The 7-Step Plan" (the Plan). (10) He presented the Plan first to the Provost and the President of WSU, then "to members of the print and broadcast media in Washington [S]tate, to [other] administrators at WSU, to some of [his] colleagues, to the Murrow Professional Advisory Board, and [to] others." (11) According to the cover of the Plan, the proposed steps were circulated as a product of Marquette Books LLC, an independent publishing company owned and operated by Demers. (12) he Plan contained "broad proposals to change the direction and focus of the School," (13) such as separating its two faculties and "giving more prominent roles to faculty members with professional backgrounds." (14) Many of these proposed steps addressed the very issues considered by the Structure Committee. (15) In addition to the Plan, Demers circulated working drafts of portions of a book entitled The Ivory Tower of Babel. (16) The book "criticize[d] [WSU] bureaucracies and the internal audit and question[ed] the significance of the social sciences as a force for public policy change." (17) Demers contended that university administrators retaliated against him for circulating the Plan and drafts of The Ivory Tower of Babel and argued that his speech should be shielded from retaliatory actions by First Amendment protections of academic freedom. (18) According to Demers, these retaliatory actions adversely affected his compensation and his reputation as an academic. (19)

The district court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (20) Relying on Ninth Circuit precedent, the court focused its analysis on whether Demers was speaking as a private citizen on a matter of public concern. (21) The Ninth Circuit had previously applied Garcetti's holding that "the First Amendment does not prohibit managerial discipline based on an employee's expressions made pursuant to official responsibilities." (22) Applying this precedent, the district court found that circulating the Plan within the university community was part of Demers's job responsibilities. (23) Therefore, under the framework established in Garcetti, Demers was not entitled to First Amendment protection from his employer's retaliatory actions. (24) The district court also determined that the Plan did not address matters of public concern. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Employment Law - Free Speech Rights - Ninth Circuit Finds Garcetti Official Duty Rule Inapplicable to Professorial Speech in Public University Context
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.