First Circuit Ruling Prevents Persian Antiquities from Being Attached under Terrorism Risk Insurance Act

By Audet, Mark | Suffolk Transnational Law Review, Winter 2014 | Go to article overview

First Circuit Ruling Prevents Persian Antiquities from Being Attached under Terrorism Risk Insurance Act


Audet, Mark, Suffolk Transnational Law Review


Rubin v. Islamic Rep. Of Iran, 709 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2013).

The 2002 Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) provides an exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) rule that property of a foreign state is immune from attachment and execution in U. S. courts. (1) TRIA permits attachment and execution of foreign property that has been blocked by the United States and is owned by a designated state sponsor of terrorism. (2) In Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, (3) the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled against a group of judgment creditors attempting to utilize TRIA's exception to the FSIA, and in turn prevented a default judgment against Iran from being satisfied through attachment of Persian antiquities held in U.S. museums. (4) The First Circuit's decision to dissolve the creditors' attachment relied on the 1981 Algiers Accords which unblocked nearly all Iranian property in the United States; more notably, the court relied on the amicus brief filed by the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC). (5)

On September 4, 1997, Hamas carried out a terrorist attack at the Ben Yehuda marketplace in Jerusalem, Israel. (6) Jenny Rubin and other American citizens seriously injured in the attack initiated a civil suit against Iran, alleging Iran was liable for the terrorist attacks based on its material support to Hamas. (7) In 2003, a default judgment was entered against Iran and the plaintiffs' were awarded USD71,500,000 in compensatory damages and USD37,500,000 in punitive damages. (8) This award prompted the plaintiffs to pursue Iranian property within the United States to satisfy the default judgment. (9)

After identifying Persian antiquities housed at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston and Harvard University (collectively, museums), the plaintiffs registered the default judgment in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts and petitioned to attach the antiquities. (10) The museums moved to quash the attachment asserting Iran did not own the antiquities, and claiming even if the antiquities were property of Iran, the items were immune from attachment under FSIA. (11) The plaintiffs then sought partial summary judgment asserting, inter alia, that the antiquities were "blocked assets" and were exposed to attachment under section 201 (a) of TRIA. (12)

The district court concentrated its review on Executive Order 12,170 (1979 Order) and the subsequent Executive Order 12,281 (1981 Order) issued in resolution of the Iranian hostage crisis and as part of the Algiers Accords. (13) The court found that the 1981 Order, which unblocked "uncontested" property interests of Iran, created a situation where TRIA's attachment power was triggered only where ownership of Iranian property was contested. (14) The district court held the museums had claimed ownership of the antiquities, thereby nullifying the unblocking effect of the 1981 Order, and bringing the property within the reach of TRIA. (15) Despite this favorable ruling for the plaintiffs, the district court dissolved the attachment, holding the plaintiffs had failed to show that Iran had an attachable interest in the antiquities in question. (16) On appeal, the First Circuit upheld the order to dissolve the plaintiffs' attachments. (17) The First Circuit, however, ruled ownership of the antiquities was not contested, and the antiquities remained unblocked per the 1981 Order and not attachable under TRIA. (18)

In 2002, Congress enacted TRIA and added an exception to the FSIA allowing attachment of blocked assets of state sponsors of terrorist groups. (19) The goal of TRIA is not only to deter state sponsored terrorism through expanded authority to attach the property in the face of the FSIA, but also provide victims of terrorist attacks a means to satisfy judgments against the terrorist nations liable for their injuries. (20) Blocked assets under TRIA are those assets "seized or frozen by the United States .

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

First Circuit Ruling Prevents Persian Antiquities from Being Attached under Terrorism Risk Insurance Act
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.