Comment in Response to the Draft Model Conscientious Objection Policy

By Robert, Yves; Marchand, Michele et al. | Health Law Review, Summer 2013 | Go to article overview

Comment in Response to the Draft Model Conscientious Objection Policy


Robert, Yves, Marchand, Michele, Mazur, Cinthia, Health Law Review


Note

The timeframe did not allow for submission of the draft to the decision makers of the College des midecins du Quebec and its translation. The following comments are therefore presented in French and represent the views of the authors.

Introduction

Thank you for the invitation to comment on this article. Conscientious objection is certainly a current topic of significant importance. The debates raging in Quebec on a potential secular charter and ongoing discussions of end-of-life care, not to mention recurrent federal debates on abortion, attest to this. The College des midecins du Quebec (CMQ) is directly affected by this article, since the proposal of a conscientious objection policy is specifically addressed to medical regulatory bodies in each of the provinces and territories of Canada.

The fact that the CMQ is already at the heart of this policy, however, creates a bias that should be admitted from the outset. Our perception of the current situation and the necessity of a better policy is certainly not the same as that of the authors of the article, and a lengthy discussion would be required to cover these divergent points of view properly.

We will limit ourselves here to a few comments that may provide further food for thought.

1. Confusion

We would first like to correct certain statements that seem to us to be more or less fair, as to the immense confusion almost everywhere in Canada concerning conscientious objection as well as those responsible for the policy for physicians. We feel that they reveal an insufficient knowledge of several particularities in Quebec.

The geopolitical reality in Canada being what it is, jurisdictional disputes are all too common. However, the professional regulation of physicians is clearly a matter of provincial jurisdiction in Quebec. All physicians must be members of the CMQ to practice in the province, and it has complete jurisdiction over their professional practice, unlike other organizations such as the Federation des medecins omnipraticiens (FMOQ), the Federation des midecins specialistes (FMSQ) or the Federation des midecins residents (FMRQ), which are unions, or the Association medicale du Quebec (AMQ), which is a subsidiary of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA). To fulfil its duties, the CMQ does not issue "policy statements" as is done in the other provinces. Instead its work is based on the Code of Ethics of Physicians. Contrary to most codes of ethics, which consist of major moral principles, including that of the CMA, this code consists of some one hundred provisions dealing with violations punishable by sanctions and it has the force of law. Quebec society is in fact equipped with a veritable professional system conferring on the various orders the mission to ensure that the population is protected by quality control of the practices of its members and the authority to impose disciplinary sanctions as required.

The Code thus sets out the obligations that physicians have collectively decided to impose upon themselves regardless of their personal positions, in order to be able to assume collectively the social function assigned to them, namely oversight of the health of individuals and of the general population. The provisions are carefully chosen, worded and updated so as to eliminate any loopholes insofar as possible. The obligation to maintain and work within one's competence as well as to practise according to scientific principles is covered by specific provisions. The same is true of the obligations not to end a therapeutic relationship except on serious grounds, not to refuse to examine or treat a patient on discriminatory grounds, to provide follow-up, to maintain one's professional independence despite conflicts of interest, and so on.

Conscientious objection is the subject of a specific provision in section 24 of the Code of Ethics of Physicians, which reads as follows:

  A physician must, where his personal convictions prevent him from
  prescribing or providing professional services that may be
  appropriate, acquaint his patient with such convictions; he must
  also advise him of the possible consequences of not receiving
  such professional services. … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Comment in Response to the Draft Model Conscientious Objection Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.