Recent Developments in Legal Malpractice

By Neumeier, Richard J. | Defense Counsel Journal, April 2014 | Go to article overview

Recent Developments in Legal Malpractice


Neumeier, Richard J., Defense Counsel Journal


This article originally appeared in the January 2014 Professional Liability Committee newsletter.

I. Non-Clients

STEWART Title Guarantee Company (Stewart) hired Witherspoon, Kelly, Davenport and Toole, P.S. (Wither spoon) to defend its insured, Sterling Savings Bank (Sterling) from a claim by Mount West of lien property priority on real property. The claim was resolved in favor on Mount West and Stewart then sued Witherspoon for malpractice, alleging that it improperly failed to raise the defense of equitable subrogation. Witherspoon defended on two grounds: (1) it owed no duty because Seeding was its client, not Stewart and (2) the proposed affirmative defense was not viable. The trial judge had determined that Stewart "was an intended beneficiary of Witherspoon's representation of Sterling because of Stewart Title's retention letter ... [which] created a contractual duty on the part of Witherspoon to keep Stewart Tide informed about the progress of the lien prior to litigation." (1) Nonetheless, summary judgment was entered in favor of Witherspoon on the ground that the proposed affirmative defense was not viable. On appeal, the Washington Supreme Court rejected the trial court's analysis that the insured was the intended beneficiary of Witherspoon's representation because its interest was aligned with its insured. The Court held that a duty to inform did not give rise to a broad duty of care. With a touch of understatement, the court acknowledged "We recognize that other jurisdictions have come to a different conclusion ... (citations omitted)." (2) In fact all other jurisdictions which follow the minority rule that defense counsel retained by the insurer to defend its insured has only the insured as a client, permit the insurer to recover damages for malpractice. (3)

Cusack v. Greenberg, Traurig, LLP affirmed dismissal of a malpractice claim where there was no attorney-client relationship between the plaintiffs and the law firm. (4) The complaint stemmed from plaintiff's failed efforts to have Greenberg Traurig (Greenberg) counsel for plaintiff's former employer, American Defense Systems, Inc. (ADSI) issue a corrected opinion letter to facilitate removal of restrictive legends on his stock certificate. Greenberg had issued an opinion letter that misstated that it represented the plaintiff, rather than ADSI. Greenberg asserted that ADSI subsequently directed it not to issue a corrected letter because ADSI maintained, in a separate law suit, that plaintiff fraudulently procured his employment and the stock. Because Greenberg "represented ADSI, not its shareholders or employees and, thus, not plaintiff," the order allowing the motion to dismiss the malpractice claim was properly allowed.

Indiana permits a malpractice action by a beneficiary under a will against the attorney who drafted that will on the basis that the beneficiary is a known third party. (5) Following Mary Linder's death, a group of her relatives brought a malpractice action against the drafter of her will, Berton O'Bryan (O'Bryan). The relatives were not specifically named in the will but were listed on a form that O'Bryan had given Linder for the purpose of making bequests to her intended beneficiaries. The list was referenced in the will but not signed, dated, or witnessed. The relatives claimed that as a result of O'Bryan's negligence in drafting the will, bequests that Linder intended to make to them failed. O'Bryan claimed he never saw the list before Linder's death. Summary judgment for O'Bryan was vacated because

   Article II of Linder's will conclusively established that O'Bryan
   knew that she intended to benefit third parties whom
   she would list on a separate form that he had provided to her. To
   hold that O'Bryan did not owe the relatives a duty in this
   situation would immunize and thus encourage even more egregious
   acts of malpractice, to the detriment of innocent third-party
   beneficiaries. … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Recent Developments in Legal Malpractice
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.