Federal Rules Revisions - Make Your Voice Heard

By Smith, J. Mitchell; Weaver, Pat Long | Defense Counsel Journal, April 2014 | Go to article overview

Federal Rules Revisions - Make Your Voice Heard


Smith, J. Mitchell, Weaver, Pat Long, Defense Counsel Journal


This article originally appeared in the February 2014 Civil Justice Response Committee newsletter.

THE Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy and Civil Rules has proposed significant amendments to the Federal Civil Rules. The comment period opened August 15, 2013, but unfortunately, there has been little public comment. Many practitioners are still unfamiliar with the scope of these important potential changes. The overwhelming majority of the comments have been pro-plaintiff and anti-business. The Comment period ends February 15, 2014. There is still time to educate yourself and make your voice be heard. This article will strive to make our members aware of the proposed changes and the policy basis underlying same and to articulate the position of the IADC on two key areas of the proposed changes.

As an overview, the IADC agrees with the stated purpose of the revisions as proposed by the Advisory Committee: (1) to foster more cooperation between the parties and court involvement in managing litigation, (2) to provide additional safeguards for parties against sanctions for the failure to preserve discoverable information when the failure was not willful or in bad faith, and (3) to implement a proportionality requirement--that the scope of permissible discovery be proportional to the litigation at issue.

The IADC concurs with the Advisory Committee that the proposed amendments, with some tweaking, will provide the courts with clearer guidance on the manner in which litigants must practice in today's legal arena, an arena made more complex with advancements in technologies; will keep the legal system fair and balanced for all parties; and, will reduce ever-increasing legal costs which threaten to close access to courts.

The IADC supports the proposed amendments to Civil Rules 1, 4, 6, 16, 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36, 37, 55, 84, and the Rules' Appendix of Forms.

For two key areas of the proposed changes, the IADC has issued a formal policy statement, Rule 26(b)(1) on Scope of Discovery and Rule 37(e) Failure to Preserve Discoverable Information.

I. Rule 26(b)(1) Scope of Discovery

The Advisory Committee's proposed amendment to Rule 26(b)(1) would redefine the scope of discovery to be "any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case...." The amendment deletes the "subject matter involved in the action" from the scope of discovery in order to make clear that discovery is defined by the claims and defenses identified in the pleadings. This change would provide a meaningful improvement compared to the overbroad scope of discovery defined by current Rule 26(b)(1), which is a fundamental cause of the high costs and burdens of modern discovery.

The proposed amendment would also strike the well-known phrase, "[r]elevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." This language has erroneously been used to establish a very broad scope of discovery even though it was intended only to clarify that inadmissible evidence such as hearsay could still be within the scope of discovery so long as it is relevant (a principle the proposed amendment preserves). The proposed change would affect substantial reductions in the expenditure of resources in responding to unwarranted and irrelevant discovery while protecting the rights of litigants to obtain core evidence revealing the veracity or fallacy of claims and defenses and preserving judicial resources.

Moving the current proportionality language from Rule 26(b) (2) (C) (iii) into Rule 26(b)(1) is a modest edit, but if adopted, it would have the important effect of encouraging judges and parties alike to maintain a pragmatic perspective on what discovery should mean to each individual case. Such a pragmatic perspective will assist practitioners in planning for and budgeting the discovery obligations of their clients. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Federal Rules Revisions - Make Your Voice Heard
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.