Big Banks to Feel Brunt of Risk-Based Capital Plan; Fed Would Apply Capital Rules to Off-Balance-Sheet Activities

By Easton, Nina | American Banker, January 16, 1986 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Big Banks to Feel Brunt of Risk-Based Capital Plan; Fed Would Apply Capital Rules to Off-Balance-Sheet Activities

Easton, Nina, American Banker

WASHINGTON -- Large banks are going to find off-balance-sheet activities less attractive and liquid assets more alluring. Smaller banks are simply going to breathe a sigh of relief.

That's the preliminary view of experts who have examined the Federal Reserve Board's risk-based capital proposal, which the Fed governors unanimously decided to issue for public comment Wednesday.

In a related development, two other banking agencies -- the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. -- said Wednesday that they intend to solicit public comment on their own risk-based capital plans.

The principal effect of the Fed's proposal would be to bring certain off-balance-sheet operations -- particularly standby letters of credit -- under the capital requirements. Because off-balance-sheet activities are currently not counted as assets, they are not taken into account when calculating a bank's required capital ratio.

The issuance of letters of credit, which are a Bank's guarantee that a customer will complete a transaction, is booming at the nation's largest banks. If the Fed goes ahead with its plan, bank holding companies such as Citicorp, BankAmerica Corp., Chase Manhattan Corp., Manufacturers Hanover Corp., and other large money center institutions heavily involved in letters of credit will see their regulatory capital levels drop.

The Fed plan would not affect an existing requirement that banks maintain capital equaling at least 6% of their assets.

The proposal divides assets into four risk categories -- each with a different capital requirement. For most assets, however, the Fed proposal would not require banks to add any capital. Banks won't be "penalized" for risky loans, experts say.

"How close you can run to that minimum depends on your risk profile," William Taylor, the Fed's director of bank supervision and regulation, said in a telephone interview. While the plan won't force banks to raise more capital to cover assets already on the balance sheet, he said, it will encourage them to "do more high-liquid, high-quality business." Under the current standard, he said, "no one wants the liquidity -- it reduces their margin."

Bank analyst David Cates, of Cates Consulting Analysts Inc. in New York, predicted that the larges 200 banks could be affected by the proposed guidelines. Mr. Cates criticized the proposal for failing to include a fifth category for "substandard" assets.

Others predict that even fewer banks would feel the effects of the proposal. "I suspect it will really affect no more than a handful of major banks -- though there may be any number of troubled institutions doing foolish things that might get caught by it," said Washington attorney William J. Sweet, who represents a number of large banks.

"It should not greatly affect our banks," said Diane Casey, regulatory liaison for the Independent Bankers Association of America, which represents community bankers. "The Fed proposal looks like it is targeted at large banks that have a great deal of off-balance-sheet activities."

The Independent Bankers Association, Ms. Casey said, was pleased that the Fed proposal did not distinguish between types of loans by assigning more risk to, say, an agricultural loan than to a commercial loan.

Officials at the American Bankers Association said the plan is worth studying but expressed concerns about its effects. "We are concerned that the proposal may reduce bank's flexibility to lend to certain types of business due to their assessed risk by regulators," Donald G. Ogilvie, ABA executive vice president, said in a prepared statement. "The banking industry has significantly increased its capital in recent years, and there is no demonstrated need for further increases."

Recent data compiled by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. show that the 25 largest U.S. bank holding companies have more than $929 billion outstanding in off-balance-sheet assets.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Big Banks to Feel Brunt of Risk-Based Capital Plan; Fed Would Apply Capital Rules to Off-Balance-Sheet Activities


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?