`A VERY SPECIAL MOMENT IN HISTORY': New Zealand's Role in the Evolution of International Human Rights

By Lauren, Paul Gordon | New Zealand International Review, November 1998 | Go to article overview

`A VERY SPECIAL MOMENT IN HISTORY': New Zealand's Role in the Evolution of International Human Rights


Lauren, Paul Gordon, New Zealand International Review


Paul Gordon Lauren suggests that New Zealand exercised an influence far out of proportion to its size in the formative years of the United Nations.

The many festivities surrounding Human Rights Day 1998 will all be designed to mark an important historical milestone: the 50th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Much attention will be given during these celebrations to the remarkable progress made in the evolution of international human rights since the end of the Second World War. There will be lectures, programmes, seminars, concerts, and many speeches by government leaders. Given the nature of politics, it is highly likely that the great powers will give themselves all credit for this development and will say little or nothing about New Zealand's contribution. Given the historical evidence, this will be not only a mistake but also an injustice. The reason for this is that at a particular moment in history, New Zealand played a most significant role in advancing the cause of international human rights and made a contribution that the world is still experiencing today.

For centuries of time, and in many different places, thoughtful men and women held visions of human rights. They dreamed of a world in which all people might be universally treated with dignity, receive equal treatment, and enjoy justice and certain basic rights simply by virtue of being members of the same human family. Yet, for most of history, these visions remained theoretical dreams rather than reflections of practical reality. Over the centuries, almost all of those who lived and died never knew the meaning nor the enjoyment of human rights. Instead, they found themselves facing one kind of abuse or another and confronting various forms of discrimination and patterns of dominance based upon gender, race, class or caste, religion, ethnicity, or some other form of difference that divided people from one another. Gender and racial prejudice, intolerance, segregation, torture, conquest, exploitation, and human bondage in serfdom or slavery tended to be the norm rather than the exception, sometimes made all the more acute by cases of genocide. Of particular importance, victims of these practices suffered under governments which confidently knew in advance that how they treated those under their control would be regarded as a matter exclusively within their own domestic jurisdiction and not at all subject to the scrutiny of other states. The practices, institutions, and laws of international affairs remained essentially silent on the matter of rights and precluded victims from ever having recourse to any assistance beyond their own borders. Thus, for all practical purposes and throughout most of history, international human rights did not even exist.

Determined opposition

New Zealand clearly fit this pattern. The country was well known for its opposition to any diminution of national sovereignty in general and, more specifically, to any international efforts that might seek to address such issues as patterns of white settlement, indigenous peoples, or Asian immigration. When the Japanese proposed that the world recognise the principle of the human right of racial equality at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, for example, Prime Minister William Massey unabashedly jumped into the fray. Having earlier campaigned on a pledge `to keep the country clear of coloured and undesirable immigrants',(1) he argued that the international community should have absolutely nothing to say either about human rights or the norms of New Zealand behaviour. Although the proposal for racial equality received the support of the majority of representatives gathered at Paris, Massey was joined by the Australians, British, and Americans, who together killed it. He received praise from many quarters at home for his position, including an endorsement in the Otago Witness declaring:

   If there is one subject on which there is acute feeling . … 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

`A VERY SPECIAL MOMENT IN HISTORY': New Zealand's Role in the Evolution of International Human Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.