The Clinton Reelection Machine: Placing the Party Organization in Peril

By Tenpas, Kathryn Dunn | Presidential Studies Quarterly, Fall 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Clinton Reelection Machine: Placing the Party Organization in Peril

Tenpas, Kathryn Dunn, Presidential Studies Quarterly

By most accounts, the 1996 presidential election was a yawner. On this conventional view, President Clinton had the early edge because his opponent, the former Senate majority leader Bob Dole, was an uninspiring candidate. Dole's nomination, coming fast on the heels of several grave missteps by the rookie congressional Republican leadership, combined to give Clinton a substantial lead in the polls. Last, but not least, the 1992 mantra lived on--it was the economy stupid and its vigor buoyed an otherwise troubled president. In turn, given Clinton's lead, the news items that captured the most attention were such things as the premature resignation of Clinton consultant Dick Morris, who admitted to a long-term liaison with a Washington, D.C. prostitute; Bob Dole's surprise retirement from the Senate; and Dole's selection of erstwhile primary foe, Jack Kemp, as the vice-presidential running mate. Such news flashes were not the makings of a memorable campaign.

Au contraire. On closer examination, the oh so predictable presidential campaign of 1996 displayed many interesting and disturbing developments related to the notion of presidents as candidates. When presidents run for reelection, there is an undeniable impact on the institution of the presidency.(1) Incumbent presidents consistently exploit the office to their electoral advantage, and some even acknowledge the fact, such as George Bush in 1992 who announced, "I'll do what I have to do to get reelected."(2) And while President Clinton may not have verbalized such a commitment, the same mindset was evident. Indeed, this article's thesis is that a case study of the Clinton reelection campaign reveals new tactics and interesting features that, if adopted by future incumbents, portend a significant impact on the presidency and the party organization.

With an intense focus on securing his presidential lease for another four years, the Clinton reelection team sought to create the perfect reelection organization. Ironically, however, this quest for perfection had unintended consequences that President Clinton would certainly have sought to prevent given a second chance. In short, his zealous pursuit of reelection brought peril to his party and jeopardized his ability to govern during the second term. Oddly enough, the seemingly colorless presidential campaign had tremendous impact on the presidency and the party organization. To make this point, I offer an analysis of Clinton's reelection campaign by identifying the unique features of his quest for reelection, those elements that have emerged in prior presidential reelection campaigns, and, finally, an examination of a "perfect" campaign's fallout.

What's New?

There is no question that the disastrous midterm election results thrust the Clinton reelection machine into high gear roughly twenty-four months before the election. Stunned by the enormity of the losses and eager to maintain his hold on the executive branch, President Clinton, his White House staff, and his political consultants focused on assembling the best possible reelection campaign operation. Following the Reagan model in 1984 (which Reagan advisor, Stuart Spencer, claims was an emulation of Truman in 1948), the Clinton team studied its strategy, tactics, and timing.(3) To this Reagan model, they added extraordinary fund-raising on an expedited schedule and leadership by a candidate immersed in election details and eager to campaign for reelection.

At the same time, the Clinton team sought to avoid the Bush pitfalls. Unlike the Bush reelection campaign, the Clinton team was noted for early planning; appointing a talented, experienced staff; and maintaining a relatively harmonious relationship between the Clinton-Gore campaign organization and the White House senior staff To some degree, the modus operandi of the Clinton reelection team had to have been "See George run. Do the opposite." But the strategy was not just an aversion of the Bush pitfalls.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Clinton Reelection Machine: Placing the Party Organization in Peril


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?