The Judicial Confirmation Crisis and the Clinton Presidency

By Goldman, Sheldon | Presidential Studies Quarterly, Fall 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Judicial Confirmation Crisis and the Clinton Presidency

Goldman, Sheldon, Presidential Studies Quarterly

At a Senate Judiciary Committee business meeting on April 2, 1998, the chair of the committee, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT), announced that he had been asked and had decided "to hold over the judges until the next meeting." This provoked an immediate response from the ranking Democrat on the committee, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who observed that while it is the prerogative of the chair to hold the judges over, to do so would mean even more delay given the upcoming April recess. He then added pointedly, "I understand that your party has made a decision to stop judges or to slow them up as much as possible. I disagree with that.... I do not think it is responsible to hold up these judges." Senator Hatch responded that of the approximately eighty vacancies on the federal bench,

   we have 37 nominees ... some of whom have had some real difficulties....
   So over half the vacancies come as a result of not the committee's inaction
   but the White House. And we have been moving them regularly, and we have
   moved a lot out of this committee this year, and we will continue to do so.

At this point, Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE), the previous chair of the committee when the Senate was under Democratic Party control, chimed in: "Is there a reason why you are holding the judges over? I mean, you have a right to, but did you state a reason or you just feel like it?" Hatch replied, "I am just holding them over." Leahy interjected, "He just feels like it. It is like pulling the wings off a fly, you know, sometimes you feel like it." Hatch in response said,

   Well, I don't think these are justifiable comments because I think we have
   been moving regularly and we have been doing a lot, and we have had a lot
   on the calendar. Now I cannot control the floor, but I do have some say in
   this committee.

Interestingly, Senator Hatch eventually compromised that day, and the committee voted to favorably report four nominees for district court positions. One of the four was confirmed the next day--Ivan L. R. Lemelle to the eastern district of Louisiana. The other three had a much longer wait for confirmation--A. Howard Matz (central district of California) was confirmed on June 26 (eighty-five days after being approved by the committee); George Caram Steeh III and Arthur J. Tarnow (both to the eastern district of Michigan) were confirmed on May 13 (forty-one days after committee approval).

All this suggests a number of facets surrounding the confirmation of judges during the Clinton presidency, each of which deserves examination: (1) that the Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee has considerably slowed down the confirmation process; (2) that the actions of the Republican Senate majority leader have considerably slowed down that process; and (3) that the Clinton Administration has failed to promptly nominate individuals to fill judicial vacancies, and that has contributed to the problem--the problem being unfilled judicial positions creating significant backlogs of cases in the federal courts that have seriously compromised the ability of the courts to administer justice.

Slowdown by the Senate Judiciary Committee?

To answer the question objectively whether there has been a slowdown by the Senate Judiciary Committee, we look at some statistics from (1) the 102nd Congress, when there was divided government (with Republican President Bush in his last two years and a Democratic Senate); (2) the 103rd Congress, when there was unified government (with Democratic President Clinton and a Democratic Senate); and (3) the 104th and 105th Congresses, with divided government once again (Democratic president, Republican Senate). The figures below differentiate lifetime nominations to the district courts from lifetime appointments to the courts of appeals of general jurisdiction. Note that all figures for the 105th Congress are as of August 30, 1998.

District Court Nominees

                                    102nd             103rd
                                  Congress          Congress

Number and percentage
 of nominees who
 received hearings             100/143 (69. 

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Judicial Confirmation Crisis and the Clinton Presidency


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?