Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Personal Liability and Records Management

By: Montana, John | Records Management Quarterly, July 1998 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Personal Liability and Records Management


Montana, John, Records Management Quarterly


In the business environment, the specter of litigation is a reality. In similar fashion, records managers are accustomed to the necessity of producing large volumes of records for investigations and lawsuits. Unfortunately, we have become equally accustomed to the notion that litigation and document production are a game in which the parties attempt to circumvent the rules and avoid producing relevant material.

If, in fact, litigation and discovery are a game, then there are winners and losers. Some of the losers have become well known - large organizations have either lost lawsuits or been forced to settle on unfavorable terms when discovery abuses such as concealment of records have been revealed. Many of these outcomes have resulted in potential losses of hundred of millions or billions of dollars, making these organizations clear losers. Often, however, the temptation arises to assume that the people who have created these situations escape personally unscathed, and that the only risk in engaging in such tactics is to the organization itself. If this were ever true, the situation is changing rapidly. This article will examine recent cases in which those who attempted to circumvent the judicial process through improper discovery practices have been sanctioned by courts.

HOW PERSONAL LIABILITY ARISES

Commonly, we assume that, when acting in the course of our jobs, that it is our employer who takes responsibility for our official actions. This is true - under the legal doctrine of Respondent Superior, the master (in our case, our employer) is always responsible for the wrongdoing of his or her servant (in our case, the employee), and if an employee causes harm to a third party, the employer is liable to that third party. This is not, however, the end of the matter. Personal liability cannot be handed off like a football. However much an employer is liable for an employee's wrongdoing, the employee also remains fully liable. This liability runs to the injured third party, but it also runs …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?